[VOTE] PIP-352: Event time based topic compactor

Hi, Pulsar Community I would like to start voting thread for PIP-352: Event time based topic compactor Proposal PR https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22710 Implementation PR https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22517 Thanks -- *Marek Czajkowski* Backend developer Website: www.ds.pl Ema

[VOTE] DotPulsar Release 3.3.1-rc.1

Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the release candidate for the version 3.3.1, as follows: [ ] +1, Approve the release [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) DotPulsar's KEYS file contains the PGP keys we used to sign this release: https://downloads.apache.or

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-361: Support URI, DNS, RID, IP based Token building from client's X.509 Certificate SAN Extensions

Can someone help with this ? On Sat, Jun 15, 2024 at 1:54 PM naresh wrote: > Hello, > > This is my PIP Request at https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22917 > > If this PIP is acceptable, i am considering the following for the code > changes: > >1. Enhance the existing >org.apache.pulsa

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-361: Support URI, DNS, RID, IP based Token building from client's X.509 Certificate SAN Extensions

Hi naresh, Right now the Pulsar can only get the role from a common name, your PIP is an awesome idea that supports URI, DNS, RID, IP based Token as role, and is very helpful for large organizations. In this PIP, you will introduce many configurations of identity mechanisms, which are complex if

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-364: Introduce a new load balance algorithm AvgShedder.

Thanks, you have done great analysis. I think it makes sense to take this forward. -Lari On 2024/06/20 04:12:59 thetumbled wrote: > Hi, Pulsar Community. > I open a new PIP to introduce a new load balance algorithm AvgShedder, > which can fix some problems that current algo meet, such as lo

Re: [VOTE] PIP-352: Event time based topic compactor

+1 (binding) -Lari On 2024/06/20 08:25:28 Marek Czajkowski wrote: > Hi, Pulsar Community > I would like to start voting thread for PIP-352: Event time based topic > compactor > Proposal PR https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22710 > Implementation PR https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22517

Re: [VOTE] DotPulsar Release 3.3.1-rc.1

+1 (binding) - verified source release file hash and signature - ran build - validated the Nuget package using a simple Pulsar app Using dotnet sdk 8.0.302 (dotnet --version) on MacOS arm64. Used the documented validation process on MacOS: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/blob/master/do

Re: [DISCUSS] Cherry-pick PIP-344 Correct the behavior of the public API pulsarClient.getPartitionsForTopic

Hi all Now `3.0.x` has this fix, but the newest version(`3.3.x`) doesn't contain this fix, which is somewhat confusing, so I want to cherry-pick it to `branch-3.3`. The thread will remain open for 48 hours. If there is no objection, I will perform the cherry-picking. Thanks Yubiao Feng On Mon,

Re: [DISCUSS] Cherry-pick PIP-356 Support Geo-Replication starts at earliest position

Hi all Addational: I want to cherry-pick it to `branch-3.3` too. The thread will remain open for 48 hours. If there is no objection, I will perform the cherry-picking. Thanks Yubiao Feng On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 10:29 PM Yubiao Feng wrote: > Hi all > > I would like to start a discussion to ch

[DISCUSS] Cherry-pick PIP-321 Introduce allowed-cluster at the namespace level

Hi all I would like to start a discussion to cherry-pick PIP-321 into `branch-3.0` and `branch-3.3` - https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22378 This PIP Introduced `allowed-clusters` at the namespace level to address if replication is only enabled at the topic level, the replicator will connect

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-363: Add callback parameters to the method: org.apache.pulsar.client.impl.SendCallback.sendComplete.

+1 Jie crossover 于2024年6月19日周三 16:12写道： > Hi, Pulsar Community. > > I have created a PIP to add an `OpSendMsgStats` parameter to the > `SendCallback` interface. > This will help us implement `messaging.publish.messages` metric. > PIP link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22940 > OpenTelem

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-363: Add callback parameters to the method: org.apache.pulsar.client.impl.SendCallback.sendComplete.

Hi Jie, I support the PIP but there are something we need to consider: OpenTelemetry-javagent[1] and Apache Skywalking-javaagent[2] enhanced `SendCallback` to monitor sending messages, if we change the method sign, the java-agents can't work. It will be great that you can make it compatible, or, w

Re: [VOTE] DotPulsar Release 3.3.1-rc.1

+1 (binding) - Ran the automated tests Using dotnet sdk 8.0.302 (dotnet --version) on Windows 11. /db Lari Hotari skrev den 2024-06-20 19:23: +1 (binding) - verified source release file hash and signature - ran build - validated the Nuget package using a simple Pulsar app Using dotnet sdk 8

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-363: Add callback parameters to the method: org.apache.pulsar.client.impl.SendCallback.sendComplete.

Hi Jiuming, You are right, because the data sent in batches cannot be obtained in the current pulsar-client, so when this feature is released, we need to add an agent based on the latest version in OTel and Skywalking. -- Best Regards！ crossoverJie 太上玄元道君 于2024年6月21日周五 13:30写道： > Hi Jie, > >