Hi Xiangying
In my test, the topic-level replication works as expected when using a
different configuration metadata store but can not work as expected when
using the same configuration metadata store.
I have two questions:
- Do any exact users use the global config metadata store and still
need
Hi dev,
I proposed a PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21800
to avoid mistaken data deletion.
Please take a look and give your feedback.
--
Best Regards！
crossoverJie
Hi Jie
Maybe a limitation of Authorization permissions is better?
Thanks
Yubiao Feng
On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 7:05 PM Jie crossover
wrote:
> Hi dev,
> I proposed a PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21800
> to avoid mistaken data deletion.
> Please take a look and give your feedback.
>
+1 (binding)
- Checked the signatures
- Built from source
- Run standalone and check the produce, consume
- Verified Cassandra connector
- Verified stateful function
Regards
Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 9:32 AM Baodi Shi wrote:
> This is the second release candidate for Apache Pu
bump
Enrico Olivelli 于2023年12月18日周一 21:21写道：
> +1 (binding)
>
> Built from sources
> Run some smoke tests with Pulsar standalone
> Verified checksums and signatures (I had to import KEYS, there was a new
> key)
>
> Enrico
>
> Il giorno mer 13 dic 2023 alle ore 09:42 guo jiwei
> ha scritto:
> >
Since there seems to be agreement here, I'll proceed with the PR for
removing the code.
If there are volunteers that are willing to continue maintaining the Trino
plugin, I'll be happy to help out in setting up the new repository and
import the existing code.
Thanks,
Matteo
--
Matteo Merli
O
Hi, Ruihong
This proposal looks good to me.
BR,
Xiangying
On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 8:13 PM Xiangying Meng wrote:
> Hi, Ruihong
>
> Thanks for your proposal.
> I wonder whether we should abort all the transactions one client creates
> when the client crushes.
> For example, a process builds a Pu
