[Discuss] Revert #20659 because it introduces a class that is not supported by JDK-1.8

Hi all https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/20659 introduced the class `jdk.internal.platform.Container`, but this class was introduced by JDK-11. So after this PR, `branch-2.10` of Pulsar did not support `JDK-1.8` anymore. But our doc-side https://pulsar.apache.org/docs/2.10.x/getting-started-s

Re: [Discuss] Revert #20659 because it introduces a class that is not supported by JDK-1.8

Thanks for bringing this up to discussion, Yubiao. Yes, this needs to be reverted. My bad. I made a mistake in backporting to #20659 [1] since I misinterpreted the version information in the README's "Pulsar Runtime Java Version Recommendation" [2]. These are recommended versions, not strict lim

Re: [Discuss] Revert #20659 because it introduces a class that is not supported by JDK-1.8

Hi Lari Thank you, I saw all the context. It's such a great comment!! I reverted the PR https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/20659 Thanks Yubiao Feng On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 6:04 PM Lari Hotari wrote: > Thanks for bringing this up to discussion, Yubiao. > Yes, this needs to be reverted. > >

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-320: OpenTelemetry Scaffolding

On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 12:18 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Asaf, > > > > Il Mar 28 Nov 2023, 19:14 Asaf Mesika ha scritto: > > > Hi, > > > > This is the first sub-PIP for parent PIP-264 > > ("Enhanced OTel-based > metric > > system"). > > > > This PIP

Re: [DISCUSS] Introducing Apache Pulsar Office Hour Meetings

+1 On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 5:03 AM mattison chao wrote: > Hi, folks. > > I suggest we can run the office hour meeting every two weeks. > > - APAC Wednesday 01:00 (UTC) > - EMEA Wednesday 09:00 (UTC) > > Best, > Mattison > > > > On Nov 27, 2023, at 07:41, mattison chao wrote: > > > > Hi, guys

Re: [DISCUSS] Introducing Apache Pulsar Office Hour Meetings

Il giorno mer 29 nov 2023 alle ore 12:06 Asaf Mesika ha scritto: > > +1 > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 5:03 AM mattison chao > wrote: > > > Hi, folks. > > > > I suggest we can run the office hour meeting every two weeks. > > > > - APAC Wednesday 01:00 (UTC) > > - EMEA Wednesday 09:00 (UTC) Works

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-320: OpenTelemetry Scaffolding

Il giorno mer 29 nov 2023 alle ore 12:01 Asaf Mesika ha scritto: > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 12:18 AM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Asaf, > > > > > > > > Il Mar 28 Nov 2023, 19:14 Asaf Mesika ha scritto: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > This is the first sub-PIP for parent PIP-264 > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Introducing Apache Pulsar Office Hour Meetings

hi guys, I’ m new in this community, but i’d like to volunteer to host the meeting if need. > 2023年11月29日 19:18，Enrico Olivelli 写道： > > Il giorno mer 29 nov 2023 alle ore 12:06 Asaf Mesika > ha scritto: >> >> +1 >> >> On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 5:03 AM mattison chao >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, fol

Re: [VOTE] PIP-315: Configurable max delay limit for delayed delivery

+1 (binding) -Lari On 2023/11/15 03:59:46 Kevin Lu wrote: > Hi All, > > This thread is to start a vote for PIP-315. > > PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21490 > Discussion thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/285nm08842or324rxc2zy83wxgqxtcjp > > Regards, > Kevin >

Re: [VOTE] PIP-315: Configurable max delay limit for delayed delivery

+1 (binding) -- Matteo Merli On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 9:38 AM Lari Hotari wrote: > +1 (binding) > > -Lari > > On 2023/11/15 03:59:46 Kevin Lu wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > This thread is to start a vote for PIP-315. > > > > PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21490 > > Discussion thread: >

Re: [VOTE] PIP-315: Configurable max delay limit for delayed delivery

+1 (binding) Best, Mattison On 2023/11/15 03:59:46 Kevin Lu wrote: > Hi All, > > This thread is to start a vote for PIP-315. > > PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21490 > Discussion thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/285nm08842or324rxc2zy83wxgqxtcjp > > Regards, > Kevin >

Re: [VOTE] PIP-315: Configurable max delay limit for delayed delivery

+1 (non-binding) Thanks, Kai Wang On 2023/11/15 03:59:46 Kevin Lu wrote: > Hi All, > > This thread is to start a vote for PIP-315. > > PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21490 > Discussion thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/285nm08842or324rxc2zy83wxgqxtcjp > > Regards, > Kevin >

[DISCUSS] PIP-321 Split the responsibilities of namespace replication-clusters

Hi, Pulsar Community I drafted a proposal to make the configuration of clusters at the namespace level clearer. This helps solve the problem of geo-replication not working correctly at the topic level. https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21648 I'm looking forward to hearing from you. BR Xiang