+1(non-binding)
Thanks,
Baodi Shi
On Nov 15, 2023 at 11:49:24, Neng Lu wrote:
> +1
>
> On 2023/11/15 03:39:42 Pengcheng Jiang wrote:
>
> Hi Pulsar Community,
>
>
> This thread is to start a vote for PIP-312: Use StateStoreProvider to
>
> manage state in Pulsar Functions endpoints.
>
>
> I sta
Hi community,
This thread is to start a vote for PIP-317: Add `bookkeeperDeleted` field to
show whether a ledger is deleted from the Bookie while using tiered storage.
PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21521
Discussion thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/9kjgg06oj384myxqls73dwn8
This is release candidate 2 for the Reactive Java client for Apache
Pulsar, version 0.5.0.
*** Please download, test and vote on this release. This vote will
stay open for at least 72 hours ***
Note that we are voting upon the source (tag). Binaries in the Maven
repository are provided for conven
+1(no-binding)
Thanks,
Zike Yang
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 4:01 PM Baodi Shi wrote:
>
> +1(non-binding)
>
>
> Thanks,
> Baodi Shi
>
>
> On Nov 15, 2023 at 11:49:24, Neng Lu wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On 2023/11/15 03:39:42 Pengcheng Jiang wrote:
> >
> > Hi Pulsar Community,
> >
> >
> > This thread i
+1
——
Rui Fu
On Nov 15, 2023 at 11:41 +0800, Pengcheng Jiang
, wrote:
> Hi Pulsar Community,
>
> This thread is to start a vote for PIP-312: Use StateStoreProvider to
> manage state in Pulsar Functions endpoints.
>
> I start the voting process since there are some approves for the PIP PR.
>
> P
+1 (binding)
- run all the tests (on JDK17, M1 laptop)
- verified checksums and signatures
thanks for putting up the release
Enrico
Il giorno mer 15 nov 2023 alle ore 10:17 Christophe Bornet
ha scritto:
>
> This is release candidate 2 for the Reactive Java client for Apache
> Pulsar, version 0.
+1
- verified checksums and signatures
- run all the tests (JDK17 + M1 laptop)
Thanks for the release!
Chris
On 2023/11/15 09:14:58 Christophe Bornet wrote:
> This is release candidate 2 for the Reactive Java client for Apache
> Pulsar, version 0.5.0.
>
> *** Please download, test and vote on th
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 8:02 PM Kevin Lu wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This thread is to start a vote for PIP-315.
>
> PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21490
> Discussion thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/285nm08842or324rxc2zy83wxgqxtcjp
>
> Regards,
> Kevin
>
--
Be
Hi All, This thread is to start a vote for PIP-303. PIP:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21228 Discussion thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/c92043zq6lyrsd5z1hnln48mx858n7vj
--
Best Regards!
crossoverJie
In the latest C++ Client 3.4.0 release, we observed a regression
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-cpp/issues/346. It's a
critical bug that a crash could happen for each reconnection.
I pushed a fix (https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-cpp/pull/347).
After it's merged, I will start the r
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Yunze
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 11:01 AM Jie crossover wrote:
>
> Hi All, This thread is to start a vote for PIP-303. PIP:
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21228 Discussion thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/c92043zq6lyrsd5z1hnln48mx858n7vj
> --
> Best Regards!
>
+1
It will be important to add tests about rolling back to the previous
version of Pulsar and/or clusters with mixed versions of the brokers
(during rolling upgrades).
The old version should not complain about the new field added.
Maybe you can add a note in the PIP
Enrico
Il Mer 15 Nov 2023, 00
12 matches
Mail list logo