Re: [DISSCUSS] PIP-298: Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level

2023-09-20 Thread Xiangying Meng
Hi, all, Let's consider another example: **System**: Financial Transaction System **Operations**: Large volume of deposit and withdrawal operations, a small number of transfer operations. **Roles**: - **Client A1** - **Client A2** - **User Account B1** - **User Account B2** - **Request Topic C

Re: [VOTE] PIP-301: Introduce LoadBalanceResources to unify the load-date CRUD

2023-09-20 Thread Heesung Sohn
+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 10:25 PM 丛搏 wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Thanks, > Bo >

Re: [DISCUSS] Consistent code style (esp. ws/indent) and autotools

2023-09-20 Thread Asaf Mesika
Hang, we can do this piecemeal - Folder by folder, so we can throttle the amount of PR to make them easy to review. To make it sustainable, perhaps we can do this only on master? Regarding git blame - you have the same issue when you view a file that has been heavily modified in one commit, right?

[VOTE] PIP-299: Stop dispatch messages if the individual acks will be lost in the persistent storage

2023-09-20 Thread Yubiao Feng
Hi all I'd like to start a vote thread for the PIP-299.

Re: [VOTE] PIP-299: Stop dispatch messages if the individual acks will be lost in the persistent storage

2023-09-20 Thread Yubiao Feng
Sorry. The last email was sent by mistake. Just correct it by this one. I'd like to start a vote thread for the PIP-299. https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21118 Discussion : https://lists.apache.org/thread/2fzo1gnlyd1t5o80g1polbvbx4699r09 Thanks Yubiao Feng On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 2:49 PM