+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Penghui
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 8:09 PM Yubiao Feng
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks
> Yubiao Feng
>
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 2:53 PM Xiangying Meng
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Pulsar Community,
> >
> > This is the vote thread for PIP 296:
> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/p
+1(binding)
Best,
Mattison
On 28 Aug 2023 at 08:53 +0800, PengHui Li , wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Penghui
>
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 8:09 PM Yubiao Feng
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Thanks
> > Yubiao Feng
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 2:53 PM Xiangying Meng
> > wrote:
> >
OS: macOS Ventura Version 13.4.1 (c) (22F770820d)
Python: 3.11.4
+1 (binding)
- Checked the signature
- Build wheel from source
- Run examples
Regards,
Penghui
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 10:24 PM Yunze Xu wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Verified signature and checksums
> - Build the wheel from sour
+1
Thanks for driving the release.
Penghui
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 9:48 PM David Jensen wrote:
> Dear Apache PMC and Committers
>
> Me and Daniel Blankensteiner (blankensteiner) would like to announce we are
> soon ready to release DotPulsar 3.0.0.
>
> The release contains breaking changes, th
Hi Cong,
Thanks for driving the proposal.
Is it better to use `readNewestCompactedEntry(@Nonnull
Predicate condition)`
So that you don't need to introduce a new interface, RawEntryMetadata
And it's a more general solution for the TopicCompactionService.
WDYT?
Regards,
Penghui
On Tue, Jul 25, 2
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Hang
于2023年8月28日周一 08:59写道：
>
> +1(binding)
>
> Best,
> Mattison
> On 28 Aug 2023 at 08:53 +0800, PengHui Li , wrote:
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Penghui
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 8:09 PM Yubiao Feng
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > Thanks
>
Hi Xiangying,
Thanks for driving the proposal.
>From my understanding.
The message deduplication should only check the last chunk of the message.
It doesn't need to care about whether each chunk is duplicated.
The client side should handle issues like duplicated chunks.
For the example that you h
Hi Penghui,
>From my understanding.
>The message deduplication should only check the last chunk of the message.
Yes, I agree. If we only check the first chunk, the third chunk will be dropped.
Thanks,
Xiangying
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 10:08 AM PengHui Li wrote:
>
> Hi Xiangying,
>
> Thanks for
Hi Penghui,
Thanks for the suggestion.
First, I changed the method to findFirstEntryMetadata because I think it's more
common to look for the first matching entry compared to finding the entry of
the last match, e.g. to look for the first position greater than or equal to a
specific publish ti
+1 (binding)
Thanks for driving the proposal!
On 2023/08/25 06:52:38 Xiangying Meng wrote:
> Hi Pulsar Community,
>
> This is the vote thread for PIP 296:
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21052
>
> This PIP will help to improve the flexibility of Reader usage.
>
> Thanks,
> Xiangying
>
Hi community,
After internal discussions and agreement with Penghui and Zike, we've
come to a consensus that a small amount of dirty data within the topic
can be tolerated. As a result, this proposal has lost its
significance. We are now closing this discussion. Thanks to all
participants for thei
+1
I am looking forward to this new release.
Thanks,
Zike Yang
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 9:15 AM PengHui Li wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Thanks for driving the release.
>
> Penghui
>
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 9:48 PM David Jensen wrote:
>
> > Dear Apache PMC and Committers
> >
> > Me and Daniel Blankenstei
12 matches
Mail list logo
