+1 (binding)
(Late on the train)
Enrico
Il Gio 10 Ago 2023, 05:39 tison ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> The vote for "Accept pulsar-admin-go as part of the Apache Pulsar project"
> has PASSED and closed now.
>
> The result is as follows:
>
> 4 +1 binding Votes
> - Yunze Xu
> - tison
> - mattisonchao
> -
+1 (binding)
- Checked the signature
- Build from source (maven 3.8.6, JDK 17.0.3)
- Start standalone
- Publish and Consume
- Verified Cassandra connector
- Verified stateful function
Regards
Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 9:50 AM guo jiwei wrote:
> This is the first release candida
+1
houxiaoyu 于2023年7月24日周一 20:00写道：
> +1
>
> Thanks
> Xiaoyu Hou
>
> 丛搏 于2023年7月24日周一 19:58写道：
>
> > Hi, Pulsar Community
> >
> > I opened a new PIP design PR.
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/20859
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bo
> >
>
--
BR,
Qiang Huang
> * Should we deprecate the old way of injecting secrets? It wasn't
> widely used, and it does not work in all cases. (See the PIP for the
> old mechanism.)
I propose we leave the old way of injecting secrets in place. This
will prevent unnecessary breaking changes.
I'll add some new docs to make
Hi Pulsar Community,
This is the vote thread for PIP 289:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/20903.
This PIP will help improve Pulsar Connector Security by giving users
the ability to remove all plaintext secrets from their configurations.
Thanks,
Michael
+1 (binding)
- Michael
On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 11:43 AM Michael Marshall wrote:
>
> Hi Pulsar Community,
>
> This is the vote thread for PIP 289:
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/20903.
>
> This PIP will help improve Pulsar Connector Security by giving users
> the ability to remove all pl
On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 9:56 PM Michael Marshall
wrote:
> Thanks for your proposal, Heesung. Sorry for my late response. Just
> want to make a few points to hopefully improve the implementation.
> Overall, I think this feature is absolutely the right direction for
> Pulsar and will be a great impr
Sorry. I didn't run the check binaries commands under the root path. Now I
found that the source releases contains -
./pulsar-client-cpp/python/dist/pulsar_client-2.10.5-cp38-cp38-linux_x86_64.whl
./pulsar-client-cpp/python/CMakeFiles/_pulsar.dir/src/client.cc.o
./pulsar-client-cpp/python/CMakeFil
The command is -
$ find . -type f | perl -lne 'print if -B'
Best,
tison.
tison 于2023年8月11日周五 11:47写道：
> Sorry. I didn't run the check binaries commands under the root path. Now I
> found that the source releases contains -
>
>
> ./pulsar-client-cpp/python/dist/pulsar_client-2.10.5-cp38-cp38-l
Hi tison,
Although we have currently released the CPP and Python clients in
separate repositories, the content of the Python and CPP clients has
not been removed from the branch-2.10. The extra content you see
consists of compiled files related to the CPP and Python clients.
These files do not affe
> You can safely ignore them
Yeah. Here is no technical issue, but -
1. Source releases should not contain unexpected binaries;
2. Too large source tarball affects user experience.
I casted my +1 vote so I also made mistakes, and since we announced 2.10.5
we cannot revoke it or edit it. I post t
11 matches
Mail list logo
