So, I'm trying to summarize the motivation you have for this feature and
what we know about it, so we can proceed with discussion.
I think Pulsar users should be happy with using Pulsar and not hit a
"wall", on the other hand, there are cons to adding it:
* Exposing more to the API, adding more sur
+1(binding)
```
openjdk version "17.0.7" 2023-04-18 LTS
Apache Maven 3.8.8 (4c87b05d9aedce574290d1acc98575ed5eb6cd39)
OS name: "mac os x", version: "13.4.1", arch: "aarch64", family: "mac"
```
- Checked the signature
- Run the perf test
- Build from source
- Run the Cassandra connector validation
This is the first release candidate for Apache Pulsar version 3.1.0.
It fixes the following issues:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/milestone/35?closed=1
*** Please download, test and verify on this release. This release
candidate verification will stay open until Aug 8 ***
Note that we are ver
-1
The docker image doesn't support the `arm64` arch.
Please use this command to build the image:
```shell
mvn install -DUBUNTU_MIRROR=http://azure.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ \
-DskipTests \
-Pmain,docker -Pdocker-push \
-Ddocker.platforms=linux/amd64,linux/arm64 \
-Ddocker.organiz
+1 (binding)
- Verified the signatures and checksum
- Build from source with JDK 17.0.7 and Maven 3.9.3 on m1 macOS (aarch)
- Test basic end to end cases
- Test it with KoP 3.0.0.4
Thanks,
Yunze
On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 7:43 PM PengHui Li wrote:
>
> +1(binding)
>
> ```
> openjdk version "17.0.7"
Hi Penghui.
I think I tried to answer most of the questions and have enough usecases
for this PIP as you also mentioned in your last email. Users can use this
feature for any additional reasons like security, or convenience depending
on their usecases. I think I have also answered all the concerns
I support this proposal.
I can't understand if this is still a VOTE thread.
If it is a VOTE thread then this is my +1 (binding)
Sorry for late reply
Enrico
Il Gio 3 Ago 2023, 21:43 Rajan Dhabalia ha scritto:
> Hi Penghui.
>
> I think I tried to answer most of the questions and have enough use
+1 (binding)
• Built from source with JDK 17.0.7 and Maven 3.9.3 on Intel MacOS
• Ran produce/consume test
• Ran license check
• Ran produce/consume test based on docker server
Best,
Mattison
On 4 Aug 2023 at 02:24 +0800, Yunze Xu , wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Verified the signatures and checksu
Currently, we provide the bookie isolation feature, but its usability is
relatively low. I have proposed PIP-291(
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/20926) to improve its usability.
The original discussion is here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/zl7ymww7m4529b2wqrsg4k4r1bfxc3hs
Please take a
On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 8:02 PM PengHui Li wrote:
> > One of the advantages of this proposal (add these optional dstBrokerUrl
> fields in the existing CommandCloseProducer and CommandCloseConsumer) is
> the backward compatibility
>
> Ah, yes. I missed this point. It's a good convince.
>
> > After
Close this vote by 4 binding +1s:
- Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
- Penghui
- Yunze
- Mattison
Thanks,
Zike Yang
On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 8:47 AM wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> • Built from source with JDK 17.0.7 and Maven 3.9.3 on Intel MacOS
> • Ran produce/consume test
> • Ran license check
> • Ran produce/con
Hi, Zike Yang
We can rebuild this image to support multiple versions. But I think we don't
need to start another candidate.
Also, I wonder if it's ok to give -1 here. We should only set this item to
required if the new release process has been updated.
Plus, we should add this part to the buil
Hi -
Since this is a VERiFY then the -1 with a technical reason is good data for the
Release Manager. They can decide when there is enough feedback before cutting a
new release.
Good work!
Best,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 3, 2023, at 7:49 PM, mattisonc...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Hi, Zi
Hi, Dave
I see. Thanks!
Best,
Mattison
On 4 Aug 2023 at 11:18 +0800, Dave Fisher , wrote:
> Hi -
>
> Since this is a VERiFY then the -1 with a technical reason is good data for
> the Release Manager. They can decide when there is enough feedback before
> cutting a new release.
>
> Good work!
>
Hi, Mattison,
> Note that this RC doesn't require a formal vote, but we would also
appreciate your feedback with +1/-1. And please provide specific
comments if your feedback is not +1.
The `-1` is my feedback. It's not the vote. It's up to the release
manager to decide whether to start a new RC i
15 matches
Mail list logo
