Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-280 : Refactor CLI Argument Parsing Logic for Measurement Units using JCommander's custom converter

I read the proposal on GitHub and it's clear to reduce code duplication with a middle size refactor. Although I think it may not require a PIP, we can try to proceed in the PIP process and see if the PIP process fits this proposal. cc developers in this domain AFAIK. Best, tison. Joo Hyuk Kim

[VOTE] Pulsar Client Go Release 0.11.0 Candidate 1

Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 0.11.0, as follows: [ ] +1, Approve the release [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) This is the first release candidate for Apache Pulsar Go client, version 0.11.0. It fixes the follo

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Pulsar 2.11.2 release

Hi Enrico, Which BK release do we want to wait? I noticed that the BookKeeper community is releasing 4.14.8 and 4.16.2, but Pulsar 2.11 is using 4.15. Regards, Penghui On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 2:56 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Jiwei, > > Il giorno lun 26 giu 2023 alle ore 08:09 guo jiwei > ha s

Re: [DISCUSS] Pluggable Pulsar Functions runtime to support new runtimes

Hi, Lari. Thanks for your proposal. Sounds good to me. Supporting function pluggable essentially decouples the scheduling layer and the computing layer. This can not only extend the function runtime in more languages but even use this feature to implement a new non-function runtime plugin, such a