+1 (binding)
* Checked signatures and checksums
* Build from source and run e2e examples (Ubuntu 20.04 and Node.js v16.19.0)
* Install from NPM and run e2e examples with OAuth2 authentication
through StreamNative cloud, including the `node:19-bullseye` and
`node:19-alpine3.16` containers
Thanks,
Sounds great. +1
Thanks,
Zike Yang
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 2:37 PM Xiangying Meng wrote:
>
> Thank you for bringing up this important topic. I completely agree with
> this initiative.
> This would be a great starting point for revisiting and improving the
> Pulsar codebase.
>
> Thanks,
> Xiangyi
I think this is a good idea for the reasonable use of pulsar threads.
Thanks,
Cong Zhao
On 2023/04/18 02:07:55 mattisonc...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Hello, folks.
>
> I would like to start discussing the pulsar internal thread pool sorting out.
>
> How did I get this idea?
>
> Recently, we met so
The problem I'm trying to solve is: lack of ability to understand PIPs.
PIPs I had the chance of reading lack:
* Background information: It should contain all background information
necessary to understand the problem and the solution
* Clarity: It should be written in a coherent and easy to unders
+1 (binding)
- Checksum and signatures
- Built from sources on MacOS (JDK 17 and Maven 3.8.6)
- Run rat check and check-binary-license on the source.
- Setup Pulsar cluster with one zookeeper node, one bookie node, and
one broker node
- Checked the Grafana dashboard metrics
- Run Pulsar perf produ
+1(binding)
- Checksum and signatures
- Built from sources on MacOS (JDK 11 and Maven 3.8.6)
- Run rat check and check-binary-license on the source.
- Setup Pulsar cluster with one zookeeper node, one bookie node, and
one broker node
- Checked the Grafana dashboard metrics
- Run Pulsar perf produc
This is release candidate 1 for the Reactive Java client for Apache
Pulsar, version 0.3.0.
*** Please download, test and vote on this release. This vote will
stay open for at least 72 hours ***
Note that we are voting upon the source (tag). Binaries in the Maven
repository are provided for conven
Close this vote with 4 +1 (binding)
- Mattison
- Penghui
- Jiwei
- Hang
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 10:16 PM Hang Chen wrote:
> +1(binding)
>
> - Checksum and signatures
> - Built from sources on MacOS (JDK 11 and Maven 3.8.6)
> - Run rat check and check-binary-license on the source.
> - Setup Puls
Close this vote with 4 +1 (binding)
- Mattison
- Penghui
- Haiting
- Hang
Regards
Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 9:47 PM Hang Chen wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Checksum and signatures
> - Built from sources on MacOS (JDK 17 and Maven 3.8.6)
> - Run rat check and check-binary-license
We make this configuration item to be a dynamic configuration.
We change change it on broker level.
If we can change it on namespace level, even load of bundle in some namespace
is balanced, it is still difficult to make broker balance
On 2023/04/16 16:07:45 lifepuzzlefun wrote:
> I think this
Hi everyone,
Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 0.4.0,
as follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
* Release notes
https://git
+1 (binding)
- Checked the signature
- Build from the source package
- Start standalone
- Validate Functions
- Validate Connectors
- Validate Stateful Functions
Regards
Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 9:10 PM PengHui Li wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Checked the signature
> - Build fro
+1 (binding)
* Verified checksum and signatures
* Build from source with JDK 8 on Ubuntu 20.04
* Start the standalone with KoP 2.9.x (build from source) with JDK 8,
test producing and consuming among Pulsar clients (2.11.0) and Kafka
clients (2.8.2)
Thanks,
Yunze
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 11:17 AM
> you are ok with having a summary template, but have it non-required?
Yes to me.
In addition, I think the root cause of the problems you met is that
some PIPs have low quality. They are not clear and friendly to others.
A good proposal should not require reviewers to have deep knowledge of
a sp
The Apache Pulsar team is proud to announce Apache Pulsar version 2.10.4.
Pulsar is a highly scalable, low latency messaging platform running on
commodity hardware. It provides simple pub-sub semantics over topics,
guaranteed at-least-once delivery of messages, automatic cursor management
for
subs
> `delete-all-namespaces` and `delete-all-topics`
I support these terms as well. Regarding the concern about CLI
usability, bash completion could help a lot.
Additional questions:
1. What permission level is required for each action?
2. How will system topics be treated?
Thanks,
Michael
On Mo
16 matches
Mail list logo
