Sorry for the late response.
Why do we need to make the broker aware of the proxy when, by normal software
design, we should avoid coupling the concepts in the proxy and the broker? The
previous authentication was for historical reasons, but we should not continue
to introduce this coupling.
T
Dear Pulsar Community,
I am excited to invite you all to participate in the discussion of the
latest Pulsar proposal [1] for a transaction key mechanism. This proposal
aims to provide users with a way to ensure that only one active transaction
is associated with a given transaction key, while also
This feature is quite cool. I couldn't wait for it. It's quite useful
in the Flink connector. We can make the transaction with better
deduplication.
On Thu, Apr 6, 2023 at 8:30 PM Xiangying Meng wrote:
>
> Dear Pulsar Community,
>
> I am excited to invite you all to participate in the discussion
Hi community
I started a PIP about "Just auto-create no-partitioned DLQ And Prevent
auto-create a DLQ for a DLQ".
PIP link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/20033
### Motivation
Just auto-create no-partitioned DLQ/Retry Topic
If enabled the config `allowAutoTopicCreation,` Pulsar wi
Hi,
I am new to this security component, but how do we support token revoke?
Thanks,
Heesung
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 12:31 PM Michael Marshall
wrote:
> Here is the K8s integration: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/19888.
>
> That PR makes it possible to configure a function running in
> k
