+1 (binding)
Penghui
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 3:52 PM Nitin Goyal
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 12:29 PM guo jiwei wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> >
> > Regards
> > Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 2:36 PM Yunze Xu
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 (binding)
> >
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks
ZhangJian He
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 at 16:51, PengHui Li wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Penghui
>
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 3:52 PM Nitin Goyal
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 12:29 PM guo jiwei wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > >
> > > R
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Bo
ZhangJian He 于2023年1月31日周二 16:52写道：
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks
> ZhangJian He
>
>
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 at 16:51, PengHui Li wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Penghui
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 3:52 PM Nitin Goyal
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
>
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
Zike Yang
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 5:32 PM 丛搏 wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Bo
>
> ZhangJian He 于2023年1月31日周二 16:52写道：
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Thanks
> > ZhangJian He
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 at 16:51, PengHui Li wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> >
+1 (binding)
But I DON'T think that this implementation should go into released versions.
This is not a big problem for users and we MUST hold off adding code
to released branches if the change is not strictly necessary:
- bug that causes data corruption/data loss
- security issue
Any changes co
> - Have we considered a metadata store to persist and dedup deletion
> requests instead of the system topic? Why is the system topic the better
> choice than a metadata store for this problem?
If we use the metadata store to store the middle step ledger, we need to
operate the metadata store afte
The KEYS file is here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/pulsar/KEYS
+1 (binding)
I checked
- signatures.
- RAT/license headers
- LICENSE
- NOTICE (please update copyright to 2023)
I tried to compile, but am having issues with `gradle build`
For the next release please update the READM
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 6:43 AM Yan Zhao wrote:
> > - Have we considered a metadata store to persist and dedup deletion
> > requests instead of the system topic? Why is the system topic the better
> > choice than a metadata store for this problem?
> If we use the metadata store to store the middl
Passed the voting by 8 +1 (5 binding and 3 non-binding)
Closed.
Best,
Mattison
On Jan 31, 2023, 06:57 +0800, mattisonc...@gmail.com, wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> I would like to start the vote for PIP-242
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/19239,
> Please let me know if you have any conc
There is a serious regression bug in Pulsar C++ client 3.1.0 [1], on
which the Python client is based. And the Python client 3.0.0 also
introduces a deadlock problem [2]. In addition, now the Python client
supports Python 3.11.
I'll start a 3.1.0 release for Pulsar Python client.
[1] https://list
Congratulations!
Max Xu 于2023年1月30日周一 12:34写道：
> Congratulations! Baodi
>
> Best,
> Max Xu
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 9:36 PM Yunze Xu wrote:
>
> > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Pulsar has invited
> > Baodi Shi (https://github.com/shibd) to become a committer and we are
>
Congrats!!!
Max Xu 于2023年1月30日周一 12:33写道：
> Congratulations! Bo
>
> Best,
> Max Xu
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 9:50 PM PengHui Li wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The Apache Pulsar Project Management Committee (PMC) has invited Bo Cong
> > (https://github.com/congbobo184) as a member of the PMC a
Congratulations !!!
Zike Yang 于2023年1月30日周一 16:41写道：
> Congratulations!
>
> BR,
> Zike Yang
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 3:16 PM houxiaoyu wrote:
> >
> > Congratulations !
> >
> > Best
> > Xiaoyu Hou
> >
> > Max Xu 于2023年1月30日周一 12:34写道：
> >
> > > Congratulations! Nicolò
> > >
> > > Best,
> > >
As discussed in [0], there is a regression bug in Pulsar C++ client
3.1.0 on which the Nodejs client is based. The C++ client 3.1.1 has
been released to fix this bug [1].
We need to release a new Nodejs client to get this fix. I volunteer to
be the release manager.
The new release would be mainly
Hello, Pulsar community:
I'd like to propose releasing Apache Pulsar 2.10.4. It's been about one
month since 2.10.3 was released.
There are 45 PRs [0] needed to cherry-pick in branch-2.10. I will
cherry-pick these PRs for branch-2.10. Exclude some PRs that merge directly
into branch-2.10.
There
If we are going to create a flag named "enableStrictTopicName", we
should discuss more requirements on topic names than just
"partitioned".
At the moment, topic names are not validated using the `NamedEntity`
class's this logic [0]. Enabling stricting topic names should enable
this validation call
We did not have this discussion or vote open long enough. The
discussion started on a Saturday and then the vote started on Monday.
The vote was closed 24 hours later.
I just sent a note to the discussion thread. I would like to discuss
increasing the scope of this PIP before we officially close t
17 matches
Mail list logo
