There is an open discussion on the Apache BooKeeper mailing list about
this kind of refactoring.
I appreciate this initiative because I see it as a tentative to reduce
the tech debt.
I think that it is pretty dangerous to do this kind of change.
Pulsar uses refcounting in a very advanced way and
Hello, everyone
I submitted this PR https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/19356 to discuss if
we can accept moving this checked exception into the builder to avoid adding
more useless try-catch blocks.
In practice, we should create the new transaction like this:
```java
final TransactionBuilde
I totally agree.
There has been little API Design error to add that "throws" clause.
Thanks for the initiative
Enrico
Il giorno lun 30 gen 2023 alle ore 09:16 ha scritto:
>
> Hello, everyone
>
> I submitted this PR https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/19356 to discuss if
> we can accept movin
Thanks for your PR. I think this looks good to me.
Thanks,
Zike Yang
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 4:23 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
>
> I totally agree.
> There has been little API Design error to add that "throws" clause.
>
> Thanks for the initiative
>
> Enrico
>
> Il giorno lun 30 gen 2023 alle ore 0
Congratulations!
BR,
Zike Yang
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 3:16 PM houxiaoyu wrote:
>
> Congratulations !
>
> Best
> Xiaoyu Hou
>
> Max Xu 于2023年1月30日周一 12:34写道：
>
> > Congratulations! Nicolò
> >
> > Best,
> > Max Xu
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 8:36 PM Lari Hotari wrote:
> >
> > > Dear Com
Good suggestions,
There are three ways to write release in current pulsar and bookkeeper
projects:
1.ByteBuf.release: Call release directly without handling any exceptions;
2.ReferenceCountUtil.release: return processing status;
3. ReferenceCountUtil. safeRelease: without return value, print except
Now that the DISCUSSION thread has received some more input and some time
has passed I would like to start the VOTE again.
Best,
Alexander
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 3:21 AM Bonan Hou
wrote:
> +1
>
> Bonan Hou
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 9:56 PM Alexander Preuss
> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
>
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 30, 2023, at 1:21 AM, Shiji Lu wrote:
>
> Good suggestions,
> There are three ways to write release in current pulsar and bookkeeper
> projects:
> 1.ByteBuf.release: Call release directly without handling any exceptions;
> 2.ReferenceCountUtil.release: return pro
+1 (non-binding)
Le ven. 20 janv. 2023 à 12:06, SiNan Liu a écrit :
> Hello community,
>
> I'm starting the VOTE for PIP-236: Record schema in the request and carry
> to the broker when subscribing with AUTO_CONSUME schema.
>
> PIP link:
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/19113
>
> Discus
> Couples of notes:
>
> 1.
>
> > In the LedgerDeletionService start, it will create a producer to send
> > pending delete ledger.
> > When delete a ledger, a PendingDeleteLedgerInfo msg with 1 min delay (the
> > delay is for consumer side, if send it immediately, maybe the metadata
> > din't c
+1
Thanks,
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno lun 30 gen 2023 alle ore 09:33 Zike Yang ha
scritto:
> Thanks for your PR. I think this looks good to me.
>
> Thanks,
> Zike Yang
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 4:23 PM Enrico Olivelli
> wrote:
> >
> > I totally agree.
> > There has been little API Design error
Hi,
I assume the deletion APIs are async(when a user requests deletion, pulsar
first returns success to the user if the request is persisted. Then, Pulsar
asynchronously runs the deletion flow)
- Have we considered a metadata store to persist and dedup deletion
requests instead of the system top
This is the release candidate 1 for the Reactive Java client for
Apache Pulsar, version 0.2.0.
*** Please download, test and vote on this release. This vote will
stay open for at least 72 hours ***
Note that we are voting upon the source (tag). Binaries in the Maven
repository are provided for co
This is the release candidate 1 for the Reactive Java client for Apache
Pulsar, version 0.2.0.
*** Please download, test and vote on this release. This vote will stay
open for at least 72 hours ***
Note that we are voting upon the source (tag). Binaries in the Maven
repository are provided for co
There's a typo in the release tag link so please ignore this mail and vote
on the new mail that was sent.
Best regards
Christophe
Le lun. 30 janv. 2023 à 20:00, Christophe Bornet a
écrit :
> This is the release candidate 1 for the Reactive Java client for Apache
> Pulsar, version 0.2.0.
>
>
Hei
I can't find the "-all" docker image on dockerhub:
https://hub.docker.com/r/apachepulsar/pulsar-all/tags?page=1&name=2.9
The base image has been uploaded correctly
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mar 3 gen 2023 alle ore 14:11 丛搏 ha scritto:
> The Apache Pulsar team is proud to announce Apache Pu
Hi -
I’ve updated https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/pulsar/KEYS to include
Christophe’s signing KEY
Regards,
Dave
> On Jan 30, 2023, at 11:03 AM, Christophe Bornet
> wrote:
>
> This is the release candidate 1 for the Reactive Java client for Apache
> Pulsar, version 0.2.0.
>
> *** P
+1 for going with default = true in the next release (3.0/2.12)
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno lun 30 gen 2023 alle ore 05:31 ha
scritto:
> Hi, Asaf, Yunze
> > You mean to say, if the topic is partitioned, the word "partition" can
> notappear in the submitted topic name, in the topic creation API?
>
Hello everyone.
I would like to start the vote for PIP-242
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/19239,
Please let me know if you have any concerns or questions.
Best,
Mattison
--- Paste original PIP content to help quote --
### Motivation
Currently, the Apache Pulsar broker allows
New voting thread with links to artifacts signed with an rsa4096 key.
Please ignore the previous mails and vote on this one.
This is the release candidate 1 for the Reactive Java client for Apache
Pulsar, version 0.2.0.
*** Please download, test and vote on this release. This vote will stay
open
I have pushed it again.
Maybe it has been pushed failed or something on my laptop when pushing all
the images.
Penghui
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 4:44 AM Nicolò Boschi wrote:
> Hei
>
> I can't find the "-all" docker image on dockerhub:
> https://hub.docker.com/r/apachepulsar/pulsar-all/tags?page=1
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Yunze
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 6:57 AM wrote:
>
> Hello everyone.
>
> I would like to start the vote for PIP-242
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/19239,
> Please let me know if you have any concerns or questions.
>
> Best,
> Mattison
>
> --- Paste original PIP c
+1 (binding)
Regards
Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 2:36 PM Yunze Xu wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Yunze
>
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 6:57 AM wrote:
> >
> > Hello everyone.
> >
> > I would like to start the vote for PIP-242
> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/19239,
>
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 12:29 PM guo jiwei wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> Regards
> Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
>
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 2:36 PM Yunze Xu
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yunze
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 6:57 AM wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello everyone.
> >
24 matches
Mail list logo
