Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Client C++ Release 3.1.0 Candidate 3

+1 binding - Verified the signatures - Verified the Linux platform follows the documentation [0] - RPM - DEB - APK [0] https://github.com/BewareMyPower/pulsar-client-cpp-demo Thanks, Penghui On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 2:06 PM Matteo Merli wrote: > +1 binding. > > Checked: > * Sour

Re: Support for Java LTS 17 (or at least 15+)

Frank, Thanks for reporting, there may be several users hitting this common issue without even being aware of it My guess is that the bug you're facing is related to https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8274349 and it has been fixed in openjdk 11.0.17. Pulsar 2.10.2 should be compatible with JDK 1

[DISCUSS] Transactions isolation design

Hi folks, I recently opened an issue about transactions [0]. The specific issue is the client requires to be able to lookup the system topic pulsar/system/transaction_coordinator_assign to get all the transaction coordinators to dial with. Since multi-tenancy is a core feature in Pulsar, this req

[DISCUSS][PIP-225] Pulsar Functions fetch parameters from local config file

Hi all, I opened a PIP to discuss: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/18744 It allows Pulsar Function to read configs from a local config file, while currently it only supports passing in configs from the command line and cannot be changed dynamically. With reading configs from files it allo

Re: [DISCUSS] Transactions isolation design

Thanks for starting the discussion. One transaction is allowed to work with multiple topics from multiple tenants/namespaces. And there are some real cases of injecting data from multiple tenants and publishing the calculated result to one or many topics under exactly-once semantics. But I agree

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.11.0 Candidate-2

FYI I am investigating some errors I see while running the Jakarta JMS TCK against a Pulsar 2.11.0rc2 server with the provided docker images. I still can't understand the problem, so I will keep you posted. Please hold on Enrico Il giorno dom 4 dic 2022 alle ore 19:13 Christophe Bornet ha scri

Re: Support for Java LTS 17 (or at least 15+)

Sorry I meant this JDK issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8281181 Nicolò Boschi Il giorno lun 5 dic 2022 alle ore 11:15 Nicolò Boschi ha scritto: > Frank, > Thanks for reporting, there may be several users hitting this common issue > without even being aware of it > > My guess is that t

Re: [Vote] PIP-223: Add metrics for all Rest Endpoints

bump Jiuming Tao 于2022年11月28日周一 16:47写道： > Dear Pulsar Community, > > Please review and vote on this PIP. > > PIP link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/18560 > > Discuss thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/z74vcn0yolzzrcc4ftonm9j3nbk4pzxm > > Thanks, > Tao Jiuming >

Re: [Vote] PIP-223: Add metrics for all Rest Endpoints

+1 Best, Mattison On Nov 28, 2022, 16:47 +0800, Jiuming Tao , wrote: > Dear Pulsar Community, > > Please review and vote on this PIP. > > PIP link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/18560 > > Discuss thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/z74vcn0yolzzrcc4ftonm9j3nbk4pzxm > > Thanks, > Ta

Re: [Vote] PIP-223: Add metrics for all Rest Endpoints

+1 binding Penghui > On Dec 6, 2022, at 09:34, mattisonc...@gmail.com wrote: > > +1 > > Best, > Mattison > On Nov 28, 2022, 16:47 +0800, Jiuming Tao , > wrote: >> Dear Pulsar Community, >> >> Please review and vote on this PIP. >> >> PIP link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/18560 >>