Re: [Vote] PIP-215: Configurable TopicCompactionStrategy for StrategicTwoPhaseCompactor and TableView

+1 (binding) Enrico Il giorno mar 15 nov 2022 alle ore 02:41 PengHui Li ha scritto: > > +1 > > Thanks, > Penghui > > On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 12:52 AM Heesung Sohn > wrote: > > > Dear Pulsar Community, > > > > Please review and vote on this PIP. > > > > PIP link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/

Re: [Vote] PIP-220 TransferShedder (only for PIP-192 New Broker Load Balancer)

+1 (binding) Enrico Il giorno ven 18 nov 2022 alle ore 08:34 PengHui Li ha scritto: > > +1 > > Penghui > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 1:40 AM Matteo Merli wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > -- > > Matteo Merli > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 3:20 PM Heesung Sohn > > wrote: > > > > > > Dear Pulsar C

Re: Pulsar Summit Asia 2022 is coming! Check the schedule and register now for free!

Hi all, Don’t forget the Summit this weekend. You can still register ! See you soon! > On Nov 8, 2022, at 12:05, Sherlock Xu > wrote: > > Hi Apache Pulsa

[GitHub] [pulsar] ngoyal16 added a comment to the discussion: How can we set retry per message

GitHub user ngoyal16 added a comment to the discussion: How can we set retry per message /close GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/discussions/18537#discussioncomment-4175649 This is an automatically sent email for dev@pulsar.apache.org. To unsubscribe, please send an email t

[GitHub] [pulsar] ngoyal16 deleted a comment on the discussion: How can we set retry per message

GitHub user ngoyal16 deleted a comment on the discussion: How can we set retry per message /close GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/discussions/18537#discussioncomment-4175649 This is an automatically sent email for dev@pulsar.apache.org. To unsubscribe, please send an email

[GitHub] [pulsar] ngoyal16 added a comment to the discussion: How can i wait consumer to deliver the message with same key

GitHub user ngoyal16 added a comment to the discussion: How can i wait consumer to deliver the message with same key can someone please help me with this? @Jason918 GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/discussions/18538#discussioncomment-4175679 This is an automatically sent e

Re: [Vote] PIP-220 TransferShedder (only for PIP-192 New Broker Load Balancer)

+1 (non-binding) Thanks, Baodi Shi > 2022年11月18日 17:02，Enrico Olivelli 写道： > > +1 (binding) > > Enrico > > Il giorno ven 18 nov 2022 alle ore 08:34 PengHui Li > ha scritto: >> >> +1 >> >> Penghui >> >> On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 1:40 AM Matteo Merli wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Ma

[Discuss] AsyncAPI Pulsar Bindings

Dear Pulsar Community, It appears that there is strong demand for AsyncAPI Pulsar bindings. The discussion is already ongoing, and there is a PR open for this work. PR: https://github.com/asyncapi/bindings/pull/173 Regards, Heesung

[GitHub] [pulsar] labuladong added a comment to the discussion: Is it possible to manually acknowledge messages via msgId?

GitHub user labuladong added a comment to the discussion: Is it possible to manually acknowledge messages via msgId? Hi @crossoverJie, > it did not achieve the desired effect > {"individuallyDeletedMessages":"[(407:4..407:5]]"} But I think this is the expected behavior: you acknowledge (mark

[GitHub] [pulsar] labuladong edited a comment on the discussion: Is it possible to manually acknowledge messages via msgId?

GitHub user labuladong edited a comment on the discussion: Is it possible to manually acknowledge messages via msgId? Hi @crossoverJie, > it did not achieve the desired effect > {"individuallyDeletedMessages":"[(407:4..407:5]]"} But I think this is the expected behavior: you acknowledge (mar

Re: Releasing current master as Pulsar 2.11.0 ?

Hi， When verifying the release, we found that there is a problem with the connector. We are looking for the cause and will continue to release it after it is fixed. Regards Jiwei Guo (Tboy) On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 3:40 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Il giorno gio 17 nov 2022 alle ore 03:06 guo j

[GitHub] [pulsar] michaeljmarshall added a comment to the discussion: Is it possible to manually acknowledge messages via msgId?

GitHub user michaeljmarshall added a comment to the discussion: Is it possible to manually acknowledge messages via msgId? I agree with @labuladong that the behavior described is the expected behavior. The message is able to be retrieved because it has not yet been deleted. However, the consu

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-215: Configurable Topic Compaction Strategy

Hi, The vote is open in this email thread. https://lists.apache.org/thread/6y8407pw4fv21n2n0cbrvsspg5tok0h7 Regards, Heesung On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 3:07 PM Heesung Sohn wrote: > Hi, > > > I would like to understand what the performance tradeoffs are for the > changes that you (as an individua

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove "triage" series labels?

I agree with removing these labels. Thanks, Michael On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 9:29 PM Yunze Xu wrote: > > +1 > > Thanks, > Yunze > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 3:12 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > Enrico > > > > Il Gio 17 Nov 2022, 18:40 Matteo Merli ha scritto: > > > > > +1 Good sugge