GitHub user urfreespace added a comment to the discussion: Pulsar Release
Timeline Page Design
we can get the release by `gh` cli, but I don't think you can get the `release
date` and `release manager` info from that. Maybe you need to add them manual
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/p
It's best to keep the behavior of producer_request_hold as it is, instead
of changing it. The current behavior is, the publisher holds at most
operationTimeoutMs (client side configuration) after which throwing the
exception. This behavior is consistent between ongoing clients and clients
with prod
GitHub user urfreespace edited a comment on the discussion: Pulsar Release
Timeline Page Design
we can get the release by `gh` cli, but I don't think you can get the `release
date` and `release manager` info from that. Maybe you need to add them manual,
pls reference here about `gh` using
ht
GitHub user urfreespace edited a comment on the discussion: Pulsar Release
Timeline Page Design
we can get the release by `gh` cli, but I don't think you can get the `release
date` and `release manager` info from that. Maybe you need to add them manual,
pls reference here about `gh` using
ht
GitHub user urfreespace edited a comment on the discussion: Pulsar Release
Timeline Page Design
we can get the release information by `gh` cli, but I don't think you can get
the `release date` and `release manager` info from that. Maybe you need to add
them manual, pls reference here about `g
More context can be found here
https://lists.apache.org/thread/q49r2blh1wmvnr0mqx2lxxkhd8c306bm
Thanks,
Penghui
On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 6:55 PM Max Xu wrote:
> Reviewed and left a comment: the actions/add-to-project says itself does
> not support the Classic GitHub Project. [1]
>
> We may need
Does it look like a new message router for the case that the message is
without the partition key?
The only difference is the router is based on the backlog.
Thanks,
Penghui
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 10:15 AM Haiting Jiang
wrote:
> Hi Mingyu,
>
> About the use case of this feature, I have some co
urfreespace commented on code in PR #183:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/183#discussion_r956844216
##
site2/tools/publish-website.sh:
##
@@ -52,11 +51,7 @@ PULSAR_SITE_TMP=/tmp/pulsar-site
mkdir -p $PULSAR_SITE_TMP/content/
fi
- echo "BUILD_ALL:"$BUIL
urfreespace commented on code in PR #183:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/183#discussion_r956844911
##
.github/workflows/ci-pulsar-website-next-build.yaml:
##
@@ -33,9 +33,9 @@ jobs:
timeout-minutes: 600
steps:
- name: checkout
-uses: act
tisonkun commented on code in PR #183:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/183#discussion_r956845707
##
site2/tools/publish-website.sh:
##
@@ -52,11 +51,7 @@ PULSAR_SITE_TMP=/tmp/pulsar-site
mkdir -p $PULSAR_SITE_TMP/content/
fi
- echo "BUILD_ALL:"$BUILD_A
GitHub user xz83718 created a discussion: Failed to subscribe :topic is
temporarily unavailable
10:18:54.027 [pulsar-client-io-1-1] WARN
org.apache.pulsar.client.impl.MultiTopicsConsumerImpl -
[persistent://zctt-tenant/oy-msg-namespace/zc_sccp_bdr_2] Failed to subscribe
for topic [persisten
Anonymitaet closed issue #57: Remove legacy doc-label-check action
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-test-infra/issues/57
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
Anonymitaet merged PR #60:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-test-infra/pull/60
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@puls
dependabot[bot] commented on PR #30:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-test-infra/pull/30#issuecomment-122968
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong.
We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by
commenting `@dependabot rebase
dependabot[bot] commented on PR #39:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-test-infra/pull/39#issuecomment-1229688981
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong.
We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by
commenting `@dependabot rebase
dependabot[bot] commented on PR #63:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-test-infra/pull/63#issuecomment-1229689062
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong.
We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by
commenting `@dependabot rebase
Thanks for your information.
I will mark this PR as a draft until the improvement of
`add-to-project` is done.
Zike Yang
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 9:36 AM PengHui Li wrote:
>
> More context can be found here
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/q49r2blh1wmvnr0mqx2lxxkhd8c306bm
>
> Thanks,
> Penghui
tisonkun commented on code in PR #183:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/183#discussion_r956873354
##
site2/tools/publish-website.sh:
##
@@ -52,11 +51,7 @@ PULSAR_SITE_TMP=/tmp/pulsar-site
mkdir -p $PULSAR_SITE_TMP/content/
fi
- echo "BUILD_ALL:"$BUILD_A
tisonkun commented on PR #183:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/183#issuecomment-1229727437
Updated to retain the current logic while removing all content when build
all.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on t
yuvalgut commented on PR #478:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-manager/pull/478#issuecomment-1229807694
Better add the binaries to the PATH in the dockerfile
`ENV PATH="/usr/lib/postgresql/13/bin/:$PATH"`
WDYT?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Servic
Hi Mingyu
> expanding partitions or modifying consumption logic cannot reduce the
consumption of new messages in time
If I understand correctly, we will no need message order guarantee if
applied this feature. If so, I think that expanding partitions can alse
solve the problem:
Consumer and
21 matches
Mail list logo
