Hi Pulsar community:
I open a pip to discuss "Batch writing ledger for transaction operation"
Proposal Link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/15370
## Motivation
Before reading the background, I suggest you read section “Transaction
Flow” of [PIP-31: Transactional Streaming](
https://doc
I have read the PIP, and overall I agree with the design.
Good work !
I am not sure I understand the part of making it configurable via a classname.
I believe it is better to simply have a flag "transactionEnableBatchWrites".
Otherwise the matrix of possible implementations will grow without limit
I think this is a nice optimization of transaction internal components.
But I have two little questions:
1. I noticed you write conf transactionMetadataStoreProviderClassName is
configured in broker.conf. Should this be added to `Configuration Changes`?
2. This proposal will add a batch mechanism f
daniel-bartz opened a new issue, #464:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-manager/issues/464
When I want to add a new _Environment_ via the web interface, nothing happen
and I get the following error in the backend logs:
```
Jun 10 14:10:52 hostname pulsar-manager[6494]: 2022-06-10
eolivelli commented on issue #464:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-manager/issues/464#issuecomment-1152639969
Can you paste the full stack trace please?
It looks like the problem is related only to TLS
Probably there is some third party library to upgrade
--
This is an
eolivelli commented on issue #464:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-manager/issues/464#issuecomment-1152640851
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47126562/bouncycastleprovider-throws-java-lang-nosuchfielderror-id-hmacwithsha3-224
You can try to upgrade BouncyCastle dependenc
daniel-bartz commented on issue #464:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-manager/issues/464#issuecomment-1152681071
Here is the full stacktrace, so you can see I use a rather new BC lib
```
Jun 10 19:46:56 hostname pulsar-manager[49051]: 2022-06-10 19:46:56.586
ERROR 49051 --- [nio-
Hi,
Can I get this PR reviewed?
This PR is to make some of the tests less flaky.
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/16011
Thanks,
Heesung
On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 5:06 AM Lari Hotari wrote:
> Dear Pulsar community members,
>
> Here's a report of the flaky tests in Pulsar CI during the obs
thomasechen commented on PR #81:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/pull/81#issuecomment-1152851431
@sijie Anu update on this request and it is really important to the world
because numbers of nodejs developmer become more amd more
--
This is an automated message from the
