Resurfacing this as it seems (to me) an important correction to be made.
Would love your opinions on this.
Thanks!
Asaf
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 1:16 PM Asaf Mesika wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have a question regarding a feature introduced in 2.6.0 called Negative
> Acknowledgement in Batch Leve
urfreespace commented on PR #90:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/90#issuecomment-1134084279
thanks a lot for @dave2wave
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specif
urfreespace merged PR #90:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/90
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pulsar.apa
+1
There are a lot of transaction fixes.
Thanks,
Hang
PengHui Li 于2022年5月21日周六 13:06写道：
>
> Hello, Pulsar community:
>
> I'd like to propose to release Apache Pulsar 2.10.1
>
> Currently, we have 190 commits [0] and there are many transaction
> fixes, security fixes.
>
> And there are 22 open P
massakam commented on PR #215:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/pull/215#issuecomment-1134166187
If https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/15508 fundamentally solves this
issue, I think it's enough to raise the minimum version of the C++ client
required by the Node.js clien
