+1
Checked:
* Signatures
* Bin distribution:
- NOTICE, README, LICENSE
- Start standalone service and producer/consumer test
* Src distribution:
- NOTICE, README, LICENSE
- Compile and unit tests
- Start standalone service
* Checked staging maven repository artifacts
+1(non-binding)
Validate Go SDK
Validate Pub/Sub and Java Functions
--
Thanks
Xiaolong Ran
Matteo Merli 于2022年3月23日周三 15:06写道：
> +1
>
> Checked:
> * Signatures
> * Bin distribution:
> - NOTICE, README, LICENSE
> - Start standalone service and producer/consumer test
> * Src distri
Thanks for voting, there are 3 bindings, I'll create the final tag `2.9.2` and
finish the subsequent release process.
On 2022/03/23 04:31:17 Hang Chen wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Checked checksum and license
> - Setup standalone cluster and run pulsar perf to produce and consume
> - Check the p
equanz commented on a change in pull request #200:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/pull/200#discussion_r832988565
##
File path: src/Client.cc
##
@@ -196,33 +236,27 @@ void LogMessage(pulsar_logger_level_t level, const char
*file, int line, const c
logCallb
+1
Thanks,
Zike Yang
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 8:32 PM 石宝迪 wrote:
>
> +1
>
>
> > 在 2022年3月22日，19:59，Haiting Jiang 写道：
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Haiting
> >
> >> On 2022/03/16 12:43:45 guo jiwei wrote:
> >> Hello community,
> >>
> >>I want to discuss refactoring and standardizing REST AP
VisualBean opened a new issue #101:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/issues/101
I would have expected this overload to have been a part of the 2.3.0
release, but I don't see it.
Is there a reason why this wasn't added to the latest release?
--
This is an automated m
I have submitted the PR for refactoring the apache/pulsar GitHub Actions based
CI. Please review https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/14819 .
BR,
-Lari
On 2022/03/22 13:38:36 Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Lari,
>
> Il Mar 22 Mar 2022, 14:32 Lari Hotari ha scritto:
>
> > I have resumed work to imp
blankensteiner commented on issue #101:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/issues/101#issuecomment-1076222900
Hi @VisualBean
It has been there since release
[2.1.0](https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#210---2022-02-02)
--
This is an autom
Matt-Esch commented on a change in pull request #200:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/pull/200#discussion_r833187982
##
File path: src/Client.cc
##
@@ -196,33 +236,27 @@ void LogMessage(pulsar_logger_level_t level, const char
*file, int line, const c
logCa
Matt-Esch commented on a change in pull request #200:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/pull/200#discussion_r833189580
##
File path: src/Consumer.cc
##
@@ -243,160 +235,225 @@ class ConsumerReceiveWorker : public Napi::AsyncWorker {
private:
Napi::Promise
I agree that fixing all the points in which we are doing sync calls is a
good thing and that we should fix them.
I won't use the name 'standardise' as it sounds to me like creating a new
API
What about 'Making the REST Admin API fully async' ?
Apart from the name I agreee with the proposal
Enri
I am running a final series of tests.
But I don't want to block the release.
Sorry for coming so late to the party
Enrico
Il Mer 23 Mar 2022, 09:49 Ran Gao ha scritto:
> Thanks for voting, there are 3 bindings, I'll create the final tag `2.9.2`
> and finish the subsequent release process.
>
> O
Hi, @Enrico
Sorry for the inappropriate words, I will correct them immediately and
applying in PIP.
Regards
Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 8:28 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> I agree that fixing all the points in which we are doing sync calls is a
> good thing and that we should fix
Hi everyone,
We saw strange behaviour , as broker stopped accepting connections and
client start receiving Connection Already Closed or Topic not available
exceptions.
The broker java process itself is up and running, but curl http ports such
as curl broker metrics stop return anything.
It is
Il giorno mer 23 mar 2022 alle ore 13:45 guo jiwei
ha scritto:
>
> Hi, @Enrico
>Sorry for the inappropriate words, I will correct them immediately and
> applying in PIP.
No problem.
Thanks for this useful contribution !
Enrico
>
> Regards
> Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 8:2
don't care about me. I had some problems today.
Feel free to complete the procedure
Sorry for the noise.
Enrico
Il giorno mer 23 mar 2022 alle ore 13:29 Enrico Olivelli
ha scritto:
>
> I am running a final series of tests.
> But I don't want to block the release.
> Sorry for coming so late to
Paul-TT commented on a change in pull request #22:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/22#discussion_r833461361
##
File path: site2/website-next/src/pages/index.js
##
@@ -149,7 +148,10 @@ export default function Home() {
pulsingWaves.classList.add("show-waves
VisualBean commented on issue #101:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/issues/101#issuecomment-1076596104
I dont see it in the current package, for some reason, ill try and inspect
the dll to see if its my IDE that is acting up
--
This is an automated message from the Apach
lhotari opened a new pull request #27:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-test-infra/pull/27
- instead of re-running all jobs in a failed workflow, re-run only the
failed jobs
- API reference:
https://docs.github.com/en/rest/reference/actions#re-run-failed-jobs-from-a-workfl
Hi,
Thank you for the problem report. Have you already filed an issue in
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues ? If not, I think it will be helpful
for tracking the issue.
When there are such issues where the broker seems to freeze, it is helpful to
get a threaddump from the frozen broker. T
I have created a separate PR to make pulsarbot support the new GitHub Actions
feature of rerunning failed jobs (instead of all jobs in a workflow). Please
review https://github.com/apache/pulsar-test-infra/pull/27 too.
-Lari
On 2022/03/23 10:46:10 Lari Hotari wrote:
> I have submitted the PR fo
Thanks Lari ,
I opened issue # 14826.
Thanks and best regards,
Tamer
On Wed, 23 Mar 2022, 18:04 Lari Hotari, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for the problem report. Have you already filed an issue in
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues ? If not, I think it will be
> helpful for tracking the i
codelipenghui merged pull request #27:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-test-infra/pull/27
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: de
urfreespace merged pull request #22:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/22
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubs
urfreespace merged pull request #23:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/23
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubs
urfreespace commented on a change in pull request #24:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/24#discussion_r833856311
##
File path: site2/yarn.lock
##
@@ -0,0 +1,277 @@
+# THIS IS AN AUTOGENERATED FILE. DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE DIRECTLY.
+# yarn lockfile v1
+
+
+"@types/
urfreespace commented on pull request #21:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/21#issuecomment-1076994590
@michaeljmarshall @Anonymitaet Any new progress? If there is no agreement
within 3 days, I will close this PR, PTAL, thanks.
--
This is an automated message from the Apac
The Apache Pulsar team is proud to announce Apache Pulsar version 2.8.3.
Pulsar is a highly scalable, low latency messaging platform running on
commodity hardware. It provides simple pub-sub semantics over topics,
guaranteed at-least-once delivery of messages, automatic cursor management for
subsc
michaeljmarshall commented on pull request #21:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/21#issuecomment-1077151027
@Anonymitaet - that is a good solution. In looking at making the change, I
noticed that I cannot update the table without also adding links for
"subscribe", "unsubscri
lhotari commented on a change in pull request #23:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/23#discussion_r833951057
##
File path: site2/website-next/src/pages/contributing.md
##
@@ -201,6 +201,10 @@ You'll then push to your branch on GitHub. Note: when
updating your co
Anonymitaet commented on a change in pull request #23:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/23#discussion_r833960205
##
File path: site2/website-next/src/pages/contributing.md
##
@@ -201,6 +201,10 @@ You'll then push to your branch on GitHub. Note: when
updating you
Anonymitaet commented on pull request #21:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/21#issuecomment-1077286923
> @Anonymitaet - that is a good solution. In looking at making the change, I
noticed that I cannot update the table without also adding links for
"subscribe", "unsubscribe"
Anonymitaet edited a comment on pull request #21:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/21#issuecomment-1077286923
> @Anonymitaet - that is a good solution. In looking at making the change, I
noticed that I cannot update the table without also adding links for
"subscribe", "unsub
33 matches
Mail list logo
