Anonymitaet commented on pull request #21:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/21#issuecomment-1073646750
@michaeljmarshall thanks for your explanations! That makes sense.
To avoid duplication and add references, how about changing it as below?
(add a row for secur...@apach
aluccaroni opened a new pull request #452:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-manager/pull/452
This is a DRAFT, do not merge
I'm trying to update BKVM on pulsar-manager...just by updating graddle
dependencies for BKVM and HerdDB I see that the build process is removing many
files
eolivelli commented on a change in pull request #452:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-manager/pull/452#discussion_r830914897
##
File path: gradle.properties
##
@@ -18,8 +18,8 @@ apiMockitoVersion=1.7.1
mockitoJunit4Version=1.7.1
gsonVersion=2.8.2
postgresqlVersion=42.2
eolivelli commented on pull request #452:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-manager/pull/452#issuecomment-1073695250
does the build work without your patch ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
aluccaroni closed pull request #452:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-manager/pull/452
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un
aluccaroni commented on pull request #452:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-manager/pull/452#issuecomment-1073717984
@eolivelli the frontend file are removed with a "./gradlew clean build" on
the current master, so the patch isn't the culprit
--
This is an automated message from the
eolivelli commented on pull request #453:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-manager/pull/453#issuecomment-1073812359
Tested locally, with pulsar standalone. BKVM works like a charm !
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
eolivelli merged pull request #453:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-manager/pull/453
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-uns
Hi all,
Recently I found a document error when configuring Pulsar client for TLS
encryption. See https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/14762. However, the code
example in the official documents is more intuitive.
See https://pulsar.apache.org/docs/en/security-tls-transport/#java-client, the
exa
sdwerwed commented on pull request #127:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart/pull/127#issuecomment-1074108404
@sijie
> I think the zone affinity would work for stateless components. I don't
think it will work well for stateful components. Because the location of bookie
sdwerwed edited a comment on pull request #127:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart/pull/127#issuecomment-1074108404
@sijie
> I think the zone affinity would work for stateless components. I don't
think it will work well for stateful components. Because the location of
sdwerwed edited a comment on pull request #127:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart/pull/127#issuecomment-1074108404
@sijie
> I think the zone affinity would work for stateless components. I don't
think it will work well for stateful components. Because the location of
Il giorno lun 21 mar 2022 alle ore 16:31 Yunze Xu
ha scritto:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Recently I found a document error when configuring Pulsar client for TLS
> encryption. See https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/14762. However, the
> code
> example in the official documents is more intuitive.
>
> Se
Thank you for uploading the images.
Michael
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 11:46 PM PengHui Li wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> Images have been uploaded.
>
> Penghui
>
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 12:19 PM PengHui Li wrote:
>
> > Thanks Michael,
> >
> > I can help push the docker image.
> > After the images
>> If it contains namespace policy replication, There are some policies no
need to replicate to another cluster
yes, local policies doesn't need to be replicate to other clusters and it
will only replicate global policies which is shared across multiple
clusters such tenant/namespace's identity-cre
Matt-Esch commented on a change in pull request #200:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/pull/200#discussion_r831660197
##
File path: src/Consumer.cc
##
@@ -79,144 +81,131 @@ void MessageListener(pulsar_consumer_t *cConsumer,
pulsar_message_t *cMessage, v
lis
Thanks for the explanation.
> yes, local policies doesn't need to be replicate to other clusters and it
will only replicate global policies which is shared across multiple
clusters such tenant/namespace's identity-creation, ACLs, replication
clusters, etc.
As described in this blog [1], section "
tuteng closed pull request #204:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/pull/204
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un
This is the fourth release candidate for Apache Pulsar 2.10.0
It fixes the following issues:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pulls?q=is%3Apr+milestone%3A2.10.0+is%3Amerged+-label%3Arelease%2F2.9.1+-label%3Arelease%2F2.9.2
*** Please download, test and vote on this release. This vote will stay op
+1
Penghui
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 11:00 AM guo jiwei wrote:
> Ok, I have updated the proposal number to 149.
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/14365.
>
> Regards
> Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 8:53 PM PengHui Li wrote:
>
> > PIP-143 is this one https://github.com/apa
Hi Yunze,
The current implementation is confusing, we should split the transport and
auth for TLS.
For transport, the code can be so like:
```
PulsarClient client = PulsarClient.builder()
.enableTls(true)
.tlsTrustCertsFilePath("ca.pem")
.tlsCertFil
BTW, auto TLS is a good idea.
Zixuan Liu 于2022年3月22日周二 11:03写道：
> Hi Yunze,
>
> The current implementation is confusing, we should split the transport and
> auth for TLS.
>
> For transport, the code can be so like:
> ```
> PulsarClient client = PulsarClient.builder()
> .enable
Matt-Esch commented on pull request #200:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/pull/200#issuecomment-1074688520
I managed to track down the segfault with valgrind and found an appropriate
workaround (issue with the node-addon-api double freeing Ref'd instances
https://github.
23 matches
Mail list logo
