blankensteiner merged pull request #95:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/pull/95
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: de
blankensteiner commented on pull request #95:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/pull/95#issuecomment-1019310909
Hi @goldenccargill
I really appreciate the PR, thanks! I'll just go ahead and merge it. Then
I'll do some minor changes and next week we can create a new release
michaeljmarshall merged pull request #113:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart/pull/113
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mai
michaeljmarshall closed issue #112:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart/issues/112
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: de
michaeljmarshall commented on a change in pull request #155:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart/pull/155#discussion_r790222142
##
File path: charts/pulsar/values.yaml
##
@@ -988,6 +988,24 @@ grafana:
requests:
memory: 250Mi
cpu: 0.1
+ volumes:
michaeljmarshall commented on issue #441:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-manager/issues/441#issuecomment-1019416957
@mattisonchao - what do you think about making it configurable to skip the
spawning of any database process in the docker image? Then, in the Pulsar Helm
Chart, we cou
dragonls commented on a change in pull request #155:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart/pull/155#discussion_r790233237
##
File path: charts/pulsar/values.yaml
##
@@ -988,6 +988,24 @@ grafana:
requests:
memory: 250Mi
cpu: 0.1
+ volumes:
+# u
> users will not touch the metadata of the producer of a DLQ
This is true of the DLQ producer, but by using the metadata map, won't
we be exposing this feature to end users implicitly because they could
add the field to the metadata map for other producers? (I am okay with
giving users this functi
This is a really important thread. I think our system topic design
needs more definition, structure, and documentation. Thanks for
starting the thread, Bo Cong.
> If the user uses it, it means that the user has considered the result of the
> clear system sub backlog
I think we need to discuss au
dragonls commented on pull request #113:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart/pull/113#issuecomment-1019429492
It seems that this PR makes CI failed.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
UR
lhotari merged pull request #204:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart/pull/204
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un
dragonls opened a new pull request #208:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart/pull/208
Fixes #112 #113
### Motivation
Fix ci error caused by wrong block of if clause.
### Modifications
Fix the wrong block of if clause.
### Verifying this change
12 matches
Mail list logo