[VOTE] PIP-99 Pulsar Proxy Extensions

Hello everyone, I would like to start a VOTE for PIP-99 Pulsar Proxy Extensions This is the PIP-99 https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12157 This is the PR for the implementation (still draft, I will complete it after the PIP is approved) https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/11838 Please V

Re: [VOTE] PIP-99 Pulsar Proxy Extensions

+1 -- Matteo Merli On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 3:01 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > I would like to start a VOTE for PIP-99 Pulsar Proxy Extensions > > This is the PIP-99 > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12157 > > This is the PR for the implementation (still draft, I wil

Re: [VOTE] PIP-99 Pulsar Proxy Extensions

+1, non binding ma 27. syysk. 2021 klo 12.01 Enrico Olivelli kirjoitti: > Hello everyone, > > I would like to start a VOTE for PIP-99 Pulsar Proxy Extensions > > This is the PIP-99 > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12157 > > This is the PR for the implementation (still draft, I will comp

Re: [VOTE] PIP-99 Pulsar Proxy Extensions

+1 (non-binding) Thanks, Michael On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:46 PM Lari Hotari wrote: > > +1, non binding > > ma 27. syysk. 2021 klo 12.01 Enrico Olivelli > kirjoitti: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > I would like to start a VOTE for PIP-99 Pulsar Proxy Extensions > > > > This is the PIP-99 > > htt

Re: [VOTE] PIP-99 Pulsar Proxy Extensions

+1 Le lun. 27 sept. 2021 à 11:01, Enrico Olivelli a écrit : > Hello everyone, > > I would like to start a VOTE for PIP-99 Pulsar Proxy Extensions > > This is the PIP-99 > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12157 > > This is the PR for the implementation (still draft, I will complete it > af

[VOTE] PIP-97 Asynchronous Authentication Provider

Hi Pulsar Community, I would like to start a VOTE for PIP-97 Asynchronous Authentication Provider. The issue for this PIP is here: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12105. The PR for all interface changes this PIP requires are here: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/12104. Note that I

Re: [Proposal] Make Dispatcher pluggable

Thanks, LGTM. Penghui On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 4:32 PM Lin Lin wrote: > > > On 2021/09/24 14:09:14, PengHui Li wrote: > > Sorry for the late reply, > > > > If a batch has 10 messages, but users only want to filter out parts of > them > > such as 3 messages, only 7 messages should be processed a

Re: [VOTE] [PIP 95] Smart Listener Selection with Multiple Bind Addresses

+1 (binding) Penghui On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 10:19 AM Fangbin Sun wrote: > +1(non-binding) > > Thanks, > Fangbin > > Eron Wright 于2021年9月25日周六 上午3:41写道： > > > Dear Pulsar community, please vote now on PIP 95: > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12040 > > > > Note that there are numerou

Re: [VOTE] PIP-99 Pulsar Proxy Extensions

+1 Penghui On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 3:22 AM Christophe Bornet wrote: > +1 > > Le lun. 27 sept. 2021 à 11:01, Enrico Olivelli a > écrit : > > > Hello everyone, > > > > I would like to start a VOTE for PIP-99 Pulsar Proxy Extensions > > > > This is the PIP-99 > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/

Correct semantics of producer close

Hi all, Recently I found a PR (https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/12195 ) that modifies the existing semantics of producer close. There're already some communications in this PR, but I think it's better to start a discussion here to let more know.