Close this vote with 4 +1 (binding)
- Mattison
- Penghui
- Haiting
- Hang
Regards
Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 9:47 PM Hang Chen wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Checksum and signatures
> - Built from sources on MacOS (JDK 17 and Maven 3.8.6)
> - Run rat check and check-binary-license
+1 (binding)
- Checksum and signatures
- Built from sources on MacOS (JDK 17 and Maven 3.8.6)
- Run rat check and check-binary-license on the source.
- Setup Pulsar cluster with one zookeeper node, one bookie node, and
one broker node
- Checked the Grafana dashboard metrics
- Run Pulsar perf produ
Ah, yes, it works after setting `PULSAR_STANDALONE_USE_ZOOKEEPER=1`
We need to push a PR to fix the validation document.
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Penghui
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 11:14 PM Haiting Jiang
wrote:
> Hi Penghui
>
> Did you set `PULSAR_STANDALONE_USE_ZOOKEEPER=1` when verifying
> Stateful
Hi Penghui
Did you set `PULSAR_STANDALONE_USE_ZOOKEEPER=1` when verifying
Stateful Functions ?
Thanks,
Haiting
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 7:48 PM PengHui Li wrote:
>
> The RC version failed to verify the state function
>
> The output:
>
> ```
> ~/Downloads/release_2.11.1/apache-pulsar-2.11.1 » bin
The RC version failed to verify the state function
The output:
```
~/Downloads/release_2.11.1/apache-pulsar-2.11.1 » bin/pulsar-admin
functions status --tenant test --namespace test-namespace --name word_count
{
"numInstances" : 1,
"numRunning" : 1,
"instances" : [ {
"instanceId" : 0,
+1 binding
- Checksum and signatures
- Built from sources using JDK 17 and maven 3.8.6
- Run rat check and check-binary-license on source.
- Run Pulsar standalone
- Validate Pub/Sub and Java Functions
- Validate Stateful Functions with `PULSAR_STANDALONE_USE_ZOOKEEPER=1`
- Run simple performance c
HI Jiwei,
> https://github.com/Technoboy-/pulsar/pull/31
About this CI, we need to make some blank modification to pom files,
in order to trigger the "OWASP dependency check", this is easy to miss
with released branches.
Thanks for driving this release.
Thanks,
Haiting
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at
+1 (Binding)
• Built from the source package (maven 3.8.6 OpenJDK 17.0)
• Ran binary package standalone with pub/sub
• Ran docker image(pulsar-all) standalone with pub/sub
• Ran License check
Best,
Mattison
On Apr 13, 2023, 13:17 +0800, guo jiwei , wrote:
> This is the second release candidat
This is the second release candidate for Apache Pulsar, version 2.11.1.
This release contains 214 commits by 53 contributors.
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/compare/v2.11.0...v2.11.1-candidate-2
CI for this release candidate
https://github.com/Technoboy-/pulsar/pull/31
*** Please download, tes
Hi all,
I want to emphasize that this issue
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/19316 has not been fixed
either in 2.11.1. The newly introduced bug of non-persistent topic
query. This affects a lot of existing customers and should be put in
the highest priority.
Thanks
Yufan Sheng
On Mon, Ap
Yes, Thanks Tison and Yubiao. Close this vote.
Regards
Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 12:32 PM Yubiao Feng
wrote:
>
> -1 (non-binding)
>
> The PR 19989[1] fixes an issue that non-super role users cannot access the
> tenant's API event if disabled authorization. We should wait for this P
-1 (non-binding)
The PR 19989[1] fixes an issue that non-super role users cannot access the
tenant's API event if disabled authorization. We should wait for this PR
merge,
Thanks
Yubiao Feng
[1] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/19989
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 4:52 PM guo jiwei wrote:
> Thi
-1 (non-biniding)
Issue 19982[1] spots a bug that users cannot use Pulsar 2.11.0 client libs
with JDK 1.8. This can be a compatibility issue that blocks this release.
Please take a look.
Best,
tison.
[1] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/19982
PengHui Li 于2023年3月31日周五 12:13写道：
> +1 (bi
+1 (binding)
- Checked the signature
- Run standalone
- Run Pulsar perf
- Verified function and state function
- Verified Cassandra connector
Regards,
Penghui
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 8:07 PM 丛搏 wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> system: mac os 12.6, Apple M1
> maven: 3.8.5
> java: OpenJDK 17.0.3
>
> -
+1 (binding)
system: mac os 12.6, Apple M1
maven: 3.8.5
java: OpenJDK 17.0.3
- Checked the signature
- Checked LICENSE
- Start standalone with zookeeper stream storage
- Publish and consume messages
- Verified Function and State Function
- Verified Cassandra connector
- Build from the source pack
+1 (binding)
- Checked the signature
- Build from source (Java 17, Ubuntu 20.04 WSL2)
- Start standalone with both RocksDB and ZooKeeper
- Run basic end-to-end Pulsar tests and topic operations via pulsar-shell
- Run basic end-to-end Kafka tests with KoP 2.11.0.4
Thanks,
Yunze
On Wed, Mar 22, 20
This is the first release candidate for Apache Pulsar, version 2.11.1.
This release contains 188 commits by 53 contributors.
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/compare/v2.11.0...v2.11.1-candidate-1
CI for this release candidate
https://github.com/Technoboy-/pulsar/pull/28
*** Please download, test
Thanks, I will start the release process soon.
Regards
Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 5:48 PM Zike Yang wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Zike Yang
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 7:45 PM wrote:
> >
> > +1,
> > Thanks for your work!
> >
> > Best,
> > Mattison
> > On Mar 15, 2023, 15:24 +0800,
+1
Thanks,
Zike Yang
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 7:45 PM wrote:
>
> +1,
> Thanks for your work!
>
> Best,
> Mattison
> On Mar 15, 2023, 15:24 +0800, PengHui Li , wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > Just a reminder, this one [0] might be a blocker for the subsequent patch
> > releases since it has introduced a new
+1,
Thanks for your work!
Best,
Mattison
On Mar 15, 2023, 15:24 +0800, PengHui Li , wrote:
> +1
>
> Just a reminder, this one [0] might be a blocker for the subsequent patch
> releases since it has introduced a new rule of the rule_name.
> Here [1] is the discussion under the private mailing threa
+1
Just a reminder, this one [0] might be a blocker for the subsequent patch
releases since it has introduced a new rule of the rule_name.
Here [1] is the discussion under the private mailing thread.
IMO, we should revert this change first before starting the release.
And I also hope more PMCs ca
+1
Thanks,
Haiting
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 11:46 AM Yubiao Feng
wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Thanks
> Yubiao Feng
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 11:43 AM guo jiwei wrote:
>
> > Hello, Pulsar community:
> >
> > I'd like to propose releasing Apache Pulsar 2.11.1. It's been about
> > two months since 2.11.0 was
+1
Thanks
Yubiao Feng
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 11:43 AM guo jiwei wrote:
> Hello, Pulsar community:
>
> I'd like to propose releasing Apache Pulsar 2.11.1. It's been about
> two months since 2.11.0 was released.
>
> There are about over 200 PRS [0] cherry-picked to branch-2.11 since
> the last r
Hello, Pulsar community:
I'd like to propose releasing Apache Pulsar 2.11.1. It's been about
two months since 2.11.0 was released.
There are about over 200 PRS [0] cherry-picked to branch-2.11 since
the last release.
If you have any important fixes or any questions, please reply to this
email an
24 matches
Mail list logo
