Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.9.3 Candidate 1

Thank you for the rc! +1 (non-binding) * verify sha512 checksums * verify gpg signatures * build pulsar and pulsar-all docker images (massimilianomirelli/pulsar{-all}:2.9.3-rc-1) * execute Fallout distributed system tests on multi-node k8s environment: * Pulsar functions, data-generator-source

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.9.3 Candidate 1

>> There are bad files, pom.xml.versionsBackup, inside the source tarball >> >> I believe that this is a problem >> How did you build the release candidate ? >> >> the source tarball should not contain temporary Maven files >> Is this problem present in other Pulsar releases ? Yes, It’s a proble

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.9.3 Candidate 1

Also, the file bin/pulsar present in the source tarball is not executable and we are missing the file "src/check-binary-license.sh" If these problems are also in 2.9.2, then I don't consider them as blocker, otherwise there is a regression Enrico Il giorno lun 4 lug 2022 alle ore 13:06 Enrico Ol

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.9.3 Candidate 1

Mattison, There are bad files, pom.xml.versionsBackup, inside the source tarball I believe that this is a problem How did you build the release candidate ? the source tarball should not contain temporary Maven files Is this problem present in other Pulsar releases ? Enrico Il giorno mer 29 giu

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.9.3 Candidate 1

The docker images: https://hub.docker.com/layers/244373555/mattison/pulsar-all/2.9.3-rc-1/images/sha256-a7cb36d64817e73ee5dbac38d5435b4584bbbd8639d41449d21adff5138729d9?context=repo https://hub.docker.com/layers/243611358/mattison/pulsar/2.9.3-rc-1/images/sha256-79132930a35ec093ac428567bcbaf406ba

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.9.3 Candidate 1

> > I found one problem with this candidate. > - When I import `pulsar-broker` and `managed-ledger` into my > project, I found the project build failed with the following > exceptions. Hi, Hang. According to the release 2.10.1 vote email, it looks like this problem gets solved and won't bloc

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.9.3 Candidate 1

> > @mattison It's better to upload the image under your org first so that we > can verify the image Sure, I will do it later. Best, Mattison On Tue, 28 Jun 2022 at 15:57, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hang, > > Il giorno lun 27 giu 2022 alle ore 04:35 Hang Chen > ha scritto: > > > > Hi Mattison,

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.9.3 Candidate 1

Hang, Il giorno lun 27 giu 2022 alle ore 04:35 Hang Chen ha scritto: > > Hi Mattison, > Thanks for your great work! > > I found one problem with this candidate. > - When I import `pulsar-broker` and `managed-ledger` into my > project, I found the project build failed with the following >

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.9.3 Candidate 1

Hi Mattison, Thanks for your great work! I found one problem with this candidate. - When I import `pulsar-broker` and `managed-ledger` into my project, I found the project build failed with the following exceptions. ``` [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project test_pulsar_lib: Could not

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.9.3 Candidate 1

+1 (binding) - verify gpg signatures - run standalone - pub/sub with pulsar-perf - verify connector (Cassandra) - verify stateful function - build image and test internally for the integration tests (all the tests get passed) @mattison It's better to upload the image under your org first so that