Re: [VOTE] PIP-414: Enforce topic consistency check

2025-06-16 Thread PengHui Li
Hi Zixuan, Thanks for driving the proposal! I believe the second rule you’re proposing is already present on the master branch: • Partitioned topic (e.g., -partition-0) with missing metadata → reject the request. Or perhaps I missed something. I’ve left a few comments on the PR — could you take

Re: [VOTE] PIP-414: Enforce topic consistency check

2025-05-28 Thread Tao Jiuming
+1 nonbinding Zixuan Liu 于2025年5月27日 周二18:12写道: > +1 (binding) > > Thanks, > Zixuan > > Zixuan Liu 于2025年5月26日周一 12:48写道: > > > Hi all, > > > > I have created a PIP to document the topic consistency check feature > > introduced in #24118. > > > > DISCUSS: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/v7v889

Re: [VOTE] PIP-414: Enforce topic consistency check

2025-05-27 Thread Zixuan Liu
+1 (binding) Thanks, Zixuan Zixuan Liu 于2025年5月26日周一 12:48写道: > Hi all, > > I have created a PIP to document the topic consistency check feature > introduced in #24118. > > DISCUSS: https://lists.apache.org/thread/v7v889qzfjpqznm713wvogmx2bs4pkkb > PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/242