+1 (binding)
I apologize for the late reviews on the PIP-385 document PR,
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/23398.
As this is already a vote thread, I support accepting PIP-385,
although the current design contains a few major challenges that
haven't been addressed yet. From my point of view,
+1 (binding)
Enrico
Il giorno mer 13 nov 2024 alle ore 03:37 Apurva Telang <
apurvatelan...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 12:26 AM Zixuan Liu wrote:
>
> > +1(non-binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Zixuan
> >
> > Girish Sharma 于2024年11月11日周一 15:02写道：
> >
> > >
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 12:26 AM Zixuan Liu wrote:
> +1(non-binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Zixuan
>
> Girish Sharma 于2024年11月11日周一 15:02写道：
>
> > Hi Pulsar dev community,
> >
> > I would like to start the voting thread for PIP-385 Add rate limit
> > semantics to pulsar protocol and Jav
+1(non-binding)
Thanks,
Zixuan
Girish Sharma 于2024年11月11日周一 15:02写道：
> Hi Pulsar dev community,
>
> I would like to start the voting thread for PIP-385 Add rate limit
> semantics to pulsar protocol and Java Client.
>
> Proposal PR: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/23398
> Rendered PIP -
>
+1
Thanks,
Rajan
On Sun, Nov 10, 2024 at 11:02 PM Girish Sharma
wrote:
> Hi Pulsar dev community,
>
> I would like to start the voting thread for PIP-385 Add rate limit
> semantics to pulsar protocol and Java Client.
>
> Proposal PR: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/23398
> Rendered PIP -
