Using the Alpine image (PIP-324 in progress), removing Python I was able to
see ~350 MB size for the `pulsar` base image.
There could be additional space savings by removing unused JVM modules from
the image.
--
Matteo Merli
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 10:09 AM Girish Sharma
wrote:
> +1
> We are
+1
Most users don't need all built-in connectors, it's too bloated.
Best Regards,
Ran Gao
On 2024/03/05 23:02:37 Matteo Merli wrote:
> The docker image `pulsar-all` is a convenience image that is created on top
> of the base `pulsar` image, including all the Pulsar IO connectors as well
> as the
+1
We are recently struggling with building a pulsar image in house (lots of
app sec constraints etc). a much reduced and minimal image would certainly
help there.
Any estimates on the size reduction in the base pulsar image after removal
of python related content? Is there scope of further slim d
+1
This can reduce the image size significantly and thus improve the
efficiency and reduce the cost.
On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 11:25 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> +1
>
> Great idea
>
> Enrico
>
> Il Mer 6 Mar 2024, 08:23 Zixuan Liu ha scritto:
>
> > +1
> >
> > This is a good idea, and then we must
+1
Great idea
Enrico
Il Mer 6 Mar 2024, 08:23 Zixuan Liu ha scritto:
> +1
>
> This is a good idea, and then we must provide a document on building the
> own connector image and python functions runtime image.
>
> Thanks,
> Zixuan
>
> Matteo Merli 于2024年3月6日周三 07:04写道：
>
> > The docker image `
+1
This is a good idea, and then we must provide a document on building the
own connector image and python functions runtime image.
Thanks,
Zixuan
Matteo Merli 于2024年3月6日周三 07:04写道：
> The docker image `pulsar-all` is a convenience image that is created on top
> of the base `pulsar` image, incl
+1, great ideas
Let's make sure there's a dedicated section in the docs on how to "migrate"
from pulsar-all:3.2.0 to "build your own -all image"
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mer 6 mar 2024 alle ore 04:22 Matteo Merli
ha scritto:
> I was proposing `pulsar-functions-python`, though I'm open to any o
I was proposing `pulsar-functions-python`, though I'm open to any other
name
--
Matteo Merli
On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 6:43 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
> What would be the name of the image that contains the functions runtime?
>
> Best,
> Dave
>
> > On Mar 5, 2024, at 6:37 PM, Lari Hotari wrote:
> >
>
What would be the name of the image that contains the functions runtime?
Best,
Dave
> On Mar 5, 2024, at 6:37 PM, Lari Hotari wrote:
>
> These are very welcome changes! Let's go ahead asap.
>
> -Lari
>
> On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 at 01:04, Matteo Merli wrote:
>>
>> The docker image `pulsar-all` is
These are very welcome changes! Let's go ahead asap.
-Lari
On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 at 01:04, Matteo Merli wrote:
>
> The docker image `pulsar-all` is a convenience image that is created on top
> of the base `pulsar` image, including all the Pulsar IO connectors as well
> as the tiered storage offload
10 matches
Mail list logo
