H
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Matteo Merli
> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2024 2:01 PM
> To: david.chris...@discordapp.com.invalid
> Cc: dev@pulsar.apache.org
> Subject: ''Re: Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-324: Alpine Docker images
>
> [You don't often get
14, 2024 2:01 PM
To: david.chris...@discordapp.com.invalid
Cc: dev@pulsar.apache.org
Subject: ''Re: Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-324: Alpine Docker images
[You don't often get email from *REDACTED*. Learn why this is important at
https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
Reviving
Reviving the discussion thread.
> For Netty, I think netty-transport-native-epoll is only built against
> glibc (
https://netty.io/wiki/native-transports.html#using-the-linux-native-transport
).
> Is there a workaround ?
Yes, there is a workaround for Netty. It works perfectly fine by including
Are we sure the move to Alpine is worth the extensive performance testing and
the risk of issues? Sticking with a popular glibc image like Temurin,
Ubuntu/Debian, or ubi-minimal (mentioned also in this discussion) seems like a
better path to me, without the risk of glibc vs musl issues. Using Di
