Re: Jenkins migration proposal

2019-11-06 Thread Ali Ahmed
Let's request apache to disable apache for ci cd on a fixed date , we can enable github ci cd in parallel. -Ali On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 4:48 AM Sijie Guo wrote: > Ali, > > I checkout your branch to my fork and submit a new pull request - > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/5574 > > Github Ac

Re: Jenkins migration proposal

2019-11-06 Thread Sijie Guo
Ali, I checkout your branch to my fork and submit a new pull request - https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/5574 Github Action now can run on the forked repo. So that we can proceed the github action approach now. - Sijie On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 2:51 AM Ali Ahmed wrote: > Thanks for verifyin

Re: Jenkins migration proposal

2019-10-25 Thread Ali Ahmed
Thanks for verifying this yong. -Ali On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 2:04 AM Yong Zhang wrote: > Hi all, > > The GitHub Actions works well on the public repo. Also can verify the pull > request from the fork. > > To test the Github Actions, I create a public repo and use an account > without the GitHub

Re: Jenkins migration proposal

2019-10-25 Thread Yong Zhang
Hi all, The GitHub Actions works well on the public repo. Also can verify the pull request from the fork. To test the Github Actions, I create a public repo and use an account without the GitHub Actions service to create a pull request. The GitHub Actions working well. I think we can consider

Re: Jenkins migration proposal

2019-08-28 Thread Matteo Merli
That would be an issue since all the PRs should be created from a user fork. On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 7:57 PM Yong Zhang wrote: > Hi all, > > I found the Github Actions only can running on the base repository. If I > create a pull request from fork repo, it will not be running. > > FYI: > > https

Re: Jenkins migration proposal

2019-08-28 Thread Yong Zhang
Hi all, I found the Github Actions only can running on the base repository. If I create a pull request from fork repo, it will not be running. FYI: https://github.community/t5/GitHub-API-Development-and/Run-a-GitHub-action-on-pull-request-for-PR-opened-from-a-forked/m-p/15426#M363 On Tue, 27 Au

Re: Jenkins migration proposal

2019-08-27 Thread Ivan Kelly
+1 for moving to actions. It looks to be azure pipelines in background. It should be able to give us more hermetic testing. Jenkins has always had issues of old builds hanging around the cluster and causing unreproducible flakes. FYI, infra are giving their blessing to people trying it out. http:/

Re: Jenkins migration proposal

2019-08-26 Thread Sijie Guo
The results look promising. +1 - Sijie On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 1:37 PM Ali Ahmed wrote: > I have finished by poc with Github actions. I propose we disable the > jenkins pr check in jobs with this. The benefits are more stable test runs > and more available resources to instantly start running

Jenkins migration proposal

2019-08-26 Thread Ali Ahmed
I have finished by poc with Github actions. I propose we disable the jenkins pr check in jobs with this. The benefits are more stable test runs and more available resources to instantly start running checkin jobs. The experimental PR is here. https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/5035 We should b