Re: Does the #13291 should contains in 2.8.2

+1 Enrico Il giorno mer 15 dic 2021 alle ore 14:27 PengHui Li ha scritto: > We should contain #13291 in 2.8.2. > > Penghui > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 7:19 PM ZhangJian He wrote: > > > Hello, > > @LinLin @lipenghui > > > > I want to discuss if #13291 should contains in release 2.8.2. > > > > It

Re: Does the #13291 should contains in 2.8.2

We should contain #13291 in 2.8.2. Penghui On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 7:19 PM ZhangJian He wrote: > Hello, > @LinLin @lipenghui > > I want to discuss if #13291 should contains in release 2.8.2. > > It's a compatible problem since 2.8, and we already commited it to master > and branch 2.9 > > > Tha

Does the #13291 should contains in 2.8.2

Hello, @LinLin @lipenghui I want to discuss if #13291 should contains in release 2.8.2. It's a compatible problem since 2.8, and we already commited it to master and branch 2.9 Thanks ZhangJian He