Re: Discussing negative acknowledgment in batch default behavior

Asaf, would you like to send a PR ? Enrico Il giorno lun 23 mag 2022 alle ore 13:38 PengHui Li ha scritto: > > I support enabling it in 2.11.0 > > Without the `Acknowledgement in Batch Level index` > Users will see a weird behavior `the acked messages dispatched to the > consumer again` > Many n

Re: Discussing negative acknowledgment in batch default behavior

I support enabling it in 2.11.0 Without the `Acknowledgement in Batch Level index` Users will see a weird behavior `the acked messages dispatched to the consumer again` Many new users thought it was a bug. For the default configuration, we should be more friendly to new users, because they have t

Re: Discussing negative acknowledgment in batch default behavior

Asaf, I don't have numbers to say something about the runtime impact. It is a important feature and I am +1 to enabling it by default You can send a PR in the meantime. I am not sure about the impact on the tests, maybe we will have to take a look carefully in order to not introduce new flaky tes

Re: Discussing negative acknowledgment in batch default behavior

Resurfacing this as it seems (to me) an important correction to be made. Would love your opinions on this. Thanks! Asaf On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 1:16 PM Asaf Mesika wrote: > Hello all, > > I have a question regarding a feature introduced in 2.6.0 called Negative > Acknowledgement in Batch Leve

Discussing negative acknowledgment in batch default behavior

Hello all, I have a question regarding a feature introduced in 2.6.0 called Negative Acknowledgement in Batch Level index, described in PIP-54 . In short: Before this feature, if you would write in batches