Looks there is no objection, I will start the official vote for PIP-130
Regards,
Penghui
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 8:25 PM Haiting Jiang
wrote:
> +1 for this PIP.
>
> Do we have plans for other languages clients? like go?
>
> Thanks,
> Haiting Jiang
>
> On 2021/12/27 13:24:52 PengHui Li wrote:
>
+1 for this PIP.
Do we have plans for other languages clients? like go?
Thanks,
Haiting Jiang
On 2021/12/27 13:24:52 PengHui Li wrote:
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13528
>
> Pasted below for quoting convenience.
>
> -
>
> PIP 130: Apply redelivery backoff policy for ack timeo
+1
I missed that we haven't cherry picked that change to 2.9.
Thanks for your confirmation
Enrico
Il Mar 28 Dic 2021, 12:44 PengHui Li ha scritto:
> Enrico
>
> > What do you mean with 'redelivery backorder has not been released yet'?
>
> I think you mean "redelivery backoff has not been rele
Enrico
> What do you mean with 'redelivery backorder has not been released yet'?
I think you mean "redelivery backoff has not been released yet"?
This proposal changed the public APIs, but the changed APIs are introduced
by
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/12566, we don't have a release
con
Penghui
I am overall +1 to this proposal but I am afraid about compatibility. Amd I
won't to be sure that we are not breaking anything.
Pulsar client and Consumer are configurable using a map of key value pairs.
So we must take care of not changing the behaviour.
What do you mean with 'redelivery
