| Subject | Re: [VOTE] PIP-180: Shadow Topic, an alternative way to
> support readonly topic ownership |
> +1
>
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 11:14 PM mattison chao
> wrote:
>
> +1(non-binding)
>
> Best,
> Mattison
>
> On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 at 22:11, Lin Lin wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>
>
+1, non-binding
- Lan.Liang
Replied Message
| From | Jia Zhai |
| Date | 8/5/2022 10:20 |
| To | |
| Subject | Re: [VOTE] PIP-180: Shadow Topic, an alternative way to support
readonly topic ownership |
+1
On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 11:14 PM mattison chao
wrote:
+1(non-binding)
Best
+1
On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 11:14 PM mattison chao
wrote:
> +1(non-binding)
>
> Best,
> Mattison
>
> On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 at 22:11, Lin Lin wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
>
+1(non-binding)
Best,
Mattison
On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 at 22:11, Lin Lin wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
+1 (binding)
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 12:59 PM Anon Hxy wrote:
> +1(non-binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Xiaoyu Hou
>
> Haiting Jiang 于2022年8月1日周一 10:23写道：
>
> > Dear Community,
> >
> > I would like to restart the VOTE on "PIP-180: Shadow Topic, an
> alternative
> > way to support readonly topic ownership.
+1(non-binding)
Thanks,
Xiaoyu Hou
Haiting Jiang 于2022年8月1日周一 10:23写道：
> Dear Community,
>
> I would like to restart the VOTE on "PIP-180: Shadow Topic, an alternative
> way to support readonly topic ownership."
>
> The proposal is updated since last vote and all can be read at [0] and the
> di
+1(non-binding)
Haiting Jiang 于2022年8月1日周一 10:23写道：
> Dear Community,
>
> I would like to restart the VOTE on "PIP-180: Shadow Topic, an alternative
> way to support readonly topic ownership."
>
> The proposal is updated since last vote and all can be read at [0] and the
> discussion thread is a
Dear Community,
I would like to restart the VOTE on "PIP-180: Shadow Topic, an alternative way
to support readonly topic ownership."
The proposal is updated since last vote and all can be read at [0] and the
discussion thread is available at [1].
Voting will stay open for at least 48h.
[0] htt
-1 (binding)
I left other comments on the discussion.
I believe that this feature is very powerful and I generally support it.
But we must clarify how it integrates with many other Pulsar features
Thanks for driving this improvement
Enrico
Il giorno mar 5 lug 2022 alle ore 08:29 Haiting Jiang
ha
Dear Community,
I would like to start a VOTE on "PIP-180: Shadow Topic, an alternative way to
support readonly topic ownership."
The proposal can be read at [0] and the discussion thread is available at [1].
Voting will stay open for at least 48h.
[0] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/161
11 matches
Mail list logo
