Hi,
It seems that INFRA failed to find the required action checks. So currently
there are no required checks for pull requests.
Committers, if you are merging a pull request, please make sure the github
actions are passed. You are able to re-run an action if it was flaky.
Thanks,
Sijie
On Tue,
Vote result:
Sijie Guo +1(binding)
xiaolong ran +1(binding)
Enrico Olivelli +1(non-binding)
Yuva raj +1(non-binding)
lan.liang +1(non-binding)
PengHui Li +1(binding)
Jia Zhai +1(binding)
Now we can start the migration. I have already built a new Jira
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1973
+1,
Thanks a lot for the work.
Best Regards.
Jia Zhai
Beijing, China
Mobile: +86 15810491983
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 10:33 AM PengHui Li wrote:
> LGTM +1
>
> lan.liang 于2020年1月15日周三 下午3:52写道：
>
> > +1 nb
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > - lan.liang
> > On 1/15/2020 15:50，Yuva raj wr
LGTM +1
lan.liang 于2020年1月15日周三 下午3:52写道：
> +1 nb
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> - lan.liang
> On 1/15/2020 15:50，Yuva raj wrote：
> +1
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020, 7:40 AM Guangning E wrote:
>
> Now pulsar's pull request is blocked on the test. We hope to migrate the
> test to Github action as soon as possible
+1 nb
- lan.liang
On 1/15/2020 15:50，Yuva raj wrote：
+1
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020, 7:40 AM Guangning E wrote:
Now pulsar's pull request is blocked on the test. We hope to migrate the
test to Github action as soon as possible. I'd like to start a vote thread
for migration tests from Jenkins to
+1
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020, 7:40 AM Guangning E wrote:
> Now pulsar's pull request is blocked on the test. We hope to migrate the
> test to Github action as soon as possible. I'd like to start a vote thread
> for migration tests from Jenkins to Github action
>
> Please vote with your opinions. The
+1 (non binding)
I hope we can do the same in Apache Bookkeeper
Enrico
Il mer 15 gen 2020, 04:34 xiaolong ran ha
scritto:
> LGTM +1
>
> --
> Thanks
> Xiaolong Ran
>
> > 在 2020年1月15日，上午10:10，Guangning E 写道：
> >
> > Now pulsar's pull request is blocked on the test. We hope to migrate the
> > t
LGTM +1
--
Thanks
Xiaolong Ran
> 在 2020年1月15日，上午10:10，Guangning E 写道：
>
> Now pulsar's pull request is blocked on the test. We hope to migrate the
> test to Github action as soon as possible. I'd like to start a vote thread
> for migration tests from Jenkins to Github action
>
> Please vote wi
+1
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:16 AM Guangning E wrote:
> The discussion is here
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rff18ec60c9838cd69adee2840ead9cf8ee7cb6331c61845ad93e776e%40%3Cdev.pulsar.apache.org%3E
>
> Guangning E 于2020年1月15日周三 上午10:10写道：
>
> > Now pulsar's pull request is blocked on
The discussion is here
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rff18ec60c9838cd69adee2840ead9cf8ee7cb6331c61845ad93e776e%40%3Cdev.pulsar.apache.org%3E
Guangning E 于2020年1月15日周三 上午10:10写道：
> Now pulsar's pull request is blocked on the test. We hope to migrate the
> test to Github action as soon as p
Now pulsar's pull request is blocked on the test. We hope to migrate the
test to Github action as soon as possible. I'd like to start a vote thread
for migration tests from Jenkins to Github action
Please vote with your opinions. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
Thanks,
Guangning
It can take days to get a jenkins pass, we should be focused on migrating
what we have first adding new workflows on a stable base is easy to do.
-Ali
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 8:04 PM Sijie Guo wrote:
> Ali, Xiaolong,
>
> Instead of waiting for the whole pull request to pass, how about adding
> t
Ali, Xiaolong,
Instead of waiting for the whole pull request to pass, how about adding
those go unit tests and code style verification as new Github Action?
So we can start moving towards Github Action.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
Sijie
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 7:54 PM Ali Ahmed wrote:
> Absolutely we l
Absolutely we launch 30 jobs in parallel per pr so it should not be a
problem, once we finish migration of current jobs we can start the process
of adding new ones.
-Ali
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 6:39 PM xiaolong ran
wrote:
> Thanks Ali work for this, overall looks good to me.
>
> Currently, Jenki
Thanks Ali work for this, overall looks good to me.
Currently, Jenkins does not check the unit tests and code specifications
related
to Go, as follows:
- pulsar-client-go
- pulsar-functions-go
In GitHub action CI. Can we consider integrating them?
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/3774
Here is PIP document
https://docs.google.com/document/d/13QKvfTj4-AMt3j7JTSE7LcyiXBK0Z0EGzp5HgMwpoj4/edit#
On Sun, Dec 1, 2019 at 9:13 PM Sijie Guo wrote:
> Without a PIP, the knowledge scatters out into many different places and
> many different conversations.
> a PIP is better since other peo
Without a PIP, the knowledge scatters out into many different places and
many different conversations.
a PIP is better since other people in the community can participate in the
development if they are interested in helping this.
- Sijie
On Sun, Dec 1, 2019 at 8:53 PM Ali Ahmed wrote:
> Sure f
Sure for unit test the plan is relatively simple. I have isolated a core
stable base which we can activate as a checkin condition.
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/5642/files#diff-00053b72be028281c6f9a446fbf91ef5
The unstable tests will be need to rewritten before being removed from
exclusio
Ali,
Thank you for driving this. Overall looks good.
I am fine with most of the proposal. However I would like to see what is
the plan to migrate the remaining java tests and integration tests.
In your current email, there are a lot of unknowns regarding java unit
tests and integration tests. I w
Hello everyone ,
I am doing experiments with github CI and I believe we are ready to vote on
the transition plan.
Briefly the current jenkins env is problematic there is resources
contention, limited parallelism and lack of control to do experiments.
The first version of the github actions ci is
20 matches
Mail list logo
