Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.7.1 Candidate 1

2021-03-15 Thread Yong Zhang
Thanks for the validation. Close this vote with 3 +1(binding), 2 +1(non-binding) I will start the subsequent release work soon. Thanks, Yong On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 09:55, Jia Zhai wrote: > +1 (binding) > > OS: MacOS 10.15.6 > > - verified packages checksum and signatures ( asc and sha all goo

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.7.1 Candidate 1

2021-03-14 Thread Jia Zhai
+1 (binding) OS: MacOS 10.15.6 - verified packages checksum and signatures ( asc and sha all good) - the source package rat check(mvn apache-rat:check), licence check, build and unit test all run successfully. - bin package build from source, 'bin/pulsar standalone' and client produce/consume ru

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.7.1 Candidate 1

2021-03-12 Thread Sijie Guo
+1 (binding) 1. LICENSE / NOTICE / Checksum / Signature are good 2. Source package can be compiled 3. Binary package is good with functionalities (pub/sub, functions, connectors) verified. - Sijie On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 10:13 AM Henry Saputra wrote: > Verify the source release artifact: > L

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.7.1 Candidate 1

2021-03-12 Thread Henry Saputra
Verify the source release artifact: LICENSE file looks good NOTICE file needs to update the year to 2021 -> Not release blocker but need to be fixed in the branch since master already updated. Checksum files look good Signature file looks good License header in source looks good (Maven Ra

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.7.1 Candidate 1

2021-03-12 Thread PengHui Li
+1 (binding) 1. Start standalone 2. Produce and consume messages 3. Verify Cassandra connector 4. Verify stateful Functions 5. Verify Pulsar SQL Thanks, - Penghui Enrico Olivelli 于2021年3月12日周五 下午2:32写道: > Thank you Yong for putting this together > > +1 (non binding) > > - Checked artifacts/che

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.7.1 Candidate 1

2021-03-11 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Thank you Yong for putting this together +1 (non binding) - Checked artifacts/checksums/signs - Built from sources on JDK8/MacOs - Run smoke tests on JDK8/MacOs - Passed integration tests of DataStax Pulsar Cassandra Sink (using Docker image) - Passed internal system tests: - including: * Dock

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.7.1 Candidate 1

2021-03-11 Thread Henry Saputra
Hi Yong, Yes, the files can be different in dev and releases directory, but the artifact files prepared for releases should be signed using key exist in both directories. If PMC are vetting on release artifacts [1], including validating the signature, it needs to use the same key to sign it. Prefe

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.7.1 Candidate 1

2021-03-10 Thread Yong Zhang
Thanks Penghui. Henry, the /dev/ directory can be accessed by all committers, so the committers can add themself keys into the KEYS file. But the /release/ directory only can be accessed by PMCs, the committers need to let PMC help to add their key into the release directory. It's ok if the KEYS f

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.7.1 Candidate 1

2021-03-09 Thread PengHui Li
@yong I have add your key to the  /release directory. Thanks, Penghui On Mar 10, 2021, 3:24 AM +0800, Henry Saputra , wrote: > Why does the KEYS file for /dev/ is different from the one in /release/ > directory? > > When users download the artifact they will verify against the one in > /release/ d

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.7.1 Candidate 1

2021-03-09 Thread Henry Saputra
Why does the KEYS file for /dev/ is different from the one in /release/ directory? When users download the artifact they will verify against the one in /release/ directory, right? - Henry On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 2:48 AM Yong Zhang wrote: > For the signature issue, I think we should use this key

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.7.1 Candidate 1

2021-03-09 Thread Yong Zhang
For the signature issue, I think we should use this keys https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pulsar/KEYS I updated the Pulsar release process https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/Release-process#8-run-the-vote The keys in the file https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/pulsar/KEYS are the

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.7.1 Candidate 1

2021-03-08 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Yong, I cannot build the docker image from the sources extracted by the source tarball. This is probably a big issue, because as I cannot build the docker image I cannot run tests on downstream applications. I am not sure this was possible with 2.7.0, so I don't know if this is a blocker for the

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.7.1 Candidate 1

2021-03-08 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Yong, I cannot find your signature at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/pulsar/KEYS can you please add yourself ? otherwise I cannot validate the digital signatures of the artifacts Thanks Enrico Il giorno lun 8 mar 2021 alle ore 05:41 Yong Zhang ha scritto: > > Hi all. > > This is the

[VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.7.1 Candidate 1

2021-03-07 Thread Yong Zhang
Hi all. This is the first release candidate for Apache Pulsar, version 2.X.0. It fixes the following issues: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pulls?page=1&q=is%3Apr+label%3Arelease%2F2.7.1+is%3Aclosed+-label%3Acomponent%2Fdocumentation *** Please download, test and vote on this release. This vot