Hi,
I think I already voted in an incorrect email thread.
+1 (binding).
Thanks,
Rajan
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 10:46 AM Andrey Yegorov
wrote:
> I am closing the voting process as *approved* with 2 binding votes and 1
> non-binding vote.
> Thank you!
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 1:19 PM Apurva Tel
I am closing the voting process as *approved* with 2 binding votes and 1
non-binding vote.
Thank you!
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 1:19 PM Apurva Telang
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 1:44 AM Lari Hotari wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding), with the condition that PIP-381 can be control
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 1:44 AM Lari Hotari wrote:
> +1 (binding), with the condition that PIP-381 can be controlled with a
> feature flag. I have provided that feedback in the discussion thread.
> I'm expecting that it gets addressed before the PIP is merged.
>
> -Lari
>
> On M
+1 (binding), with the condition that PIP-381 can be controlled with a
feature flag. I have provided that feedback in the discussion thread.
I'm expecting that it gets addressed before the PIP is merged.
-Lari
On Mon, 23 Sept 2024 at 23:08, Enrico Olivelli wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Enrico
>
>
+1 (binding)
Enrico
Il Lun 23 Set 2024, 19:41 Andrey Yegorov ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to start the voting thread for PIP-381: Handle large PositionInfo
> state.
>
> Proposal PR: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/23328
> Discussion thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/8sm0h804v591
Hi,
I'd like to start the voting thread for PIP-381: Handle large PositionInfo
state.
Proposal PR: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/23328
Discussion thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/8sm0h804v5914zowghrqxr92fp7c255d
--
Andrey
