Hi, all.
>From this comment:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22762#discussion_r1615383124
I will use `---transaction-isolation-level` to instead of
`--show-txn-uncommitted` and `--show-txn-aborted`.
This way, we can maintain consistency with the interface behavior of the
consume mentioned
Close this vote passed by 3 +1 binding:
- zike
- yubiao
- jiwei
Thanks,
Baodi Shi
On May 24, 2024 at 16:41:07, guo jiwei wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> Regards
> Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
>
>
> On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 8:29 AM Yubiao Feng
> wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Yubiao Feng
>
>
> On We
+1 (binding)
Regards
Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 8:29 AM Yubiao Feng
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks
> Yubiao Feng
>
> On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 9:55 PM Baodi Shi wrote:
>
> > Hi, all
> >
> > I would like to start the voting thread for PIP-353.
> > https://github.com/apache/pulsa
+1 (binding)
Thanks
Yubiao Feng
On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 9:55 PM Baodi Shi wrote:
> Hi, all
>
> I would like to start the voting thread for PIP-353.
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22746
>
> The implementation PR is:
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22762
>
> Discuss thread:
> htt
+1 (binding)
BR,
Zike Yang
On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 9:55 PM Baodi Shi wrote:
>
> Hi, all
>
> I would like to start the voting thread for PIP-353.
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22746
>
> The implementation PR is:
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22762
>
> Discuss thread:
> https:/
Hi, all
I would like to start the voting thread for PIP-353.
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22746
The implementation PR is:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22762
Discuss thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/dc7f64jtvg987ydztxpffqx88bp44lwv
Thanks,
Baodi Shi
