+1 (non-binding)
This is very interesting
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 5:08 AM Lan Liang wrote:
> +1, Thanks for your work!
>
>
> - lan.liang
>
>
> On 01/17/2022 20:50，ZhangJian He wrote：
> +1
>
> PengHui Li 于2022年1月17日周一 14:01写道：
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards,
> Penghui
>
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at
+1, Thanks for your work!
- lan.liang
On 01/17/2022 20:50，ZhangJian He wrote：
+1
PengHui Li 于2022年1月17日周一 14:01写道：
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Penghui
On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 9:24 PM Joe F wrote:
+1 (binding)
On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 4:46 AM Enrico Olivelli
wrote:
Il Sab 15 Gen 2022, 09:10 t
+1
PengHui Li 于2022年1月17日周一 14:01写道：
> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards,
> Penghui
>
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 9:24 PM Joe F wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 4:46 AM Enrico Olivelli
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Il Sab 15 Gen 2022, 09:10 tamer Abdlatif ha
> > > scritto:
> > >
> > > >
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Penghui
On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 9:24 PM Joe F wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 4:46 AM Enrico Olivelli
> wrote:
>
> > Il Sab 15 Gen 2022, 09:10 tamer Abdlatif ha
> > scritto:
> >
> > > Will that affect the existing ZK metadata in a pulsar instance , When
+1 (binding)
On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 4:46 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Il Sab 15 Gen 2022, 09:10 tamer Abdlatif ha
> scritto:
>
> > Will that affect the existing ZK metadata in a pulsar instance , When we
> > upgrade from a lower version to 2.10 ? In other words,
> > Do we need a metadate migra
Il Sab 15 Gen 2022, 09:10 tamer Abdlatif ha
scritto:
> Will that affect the existing ZK metadata in a pulsar instance , When we
> upgrade from a lower version to 2.10 ? In other words,
> Do we need a metadate migration to switch from ZK to Etcd ?
>
There is no need to migrate.
Most probably th
Will that affect the existing ZK metadata in a pulsar instance , When we
upgrade from a lower version to 2.10 ? In other words,
Do we need a metadate migration to switch from ZK to Etcd ?
Thanks
Tamer
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022, 22:52 Matteo Merli, wrote:
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/
+1 (binding)
Thanks
Enrico
Il Ven 14 Gen 2022, 23:52 Matteo Merli ha scritto:
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13717
>
> -
>
> ## Motivation
>
> Since all the pieces that composed the proposal in PIP-45 were finally
> merged
> and are currently ready for 2.10 release, it is now pos
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13717
-
## Motivation
Since all the pieces that composed the proposal in PIP-45 were finally merged
and are currently ready for 2.10 release, it is now possible to add other
metadata backends that can be used to support a BookKeeper + Pulsar cluster.
