Hi -
Sorry for this delayed reply.
> On Apr 7, 2022, at 7:04 PM, Roc Marshal wrote:
>
> Hi, Dave.Thank you very much for your reply.A little
> confusions from me:- As you said, the option [2] may be only used as a
> specification to restrict the coding specification of PR test cases in the
>
Hi, Dave.Thank you very much for your reply.A little confusions
from me:- As you said, the option [2] may be only used as a specification
to restrict the coding specification of PR test cases in the future. If so,
What does the new PR need to record based on master branch ? - There is no
consen
Hi -
> On Apr 7, 2022, at 6:22 AM, Roc Marshal wrote:
>
> Hi Pulsar community,
>
>
> Start voting for [DISCUSS] Migrate TestNg Assertion to AssertJ . It will
> stay open for at least 48 hours.
> The discussion thread is
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/fo43qg3jtoqy62j2zyro3j88jfhtb
Hi Pulsar community,
Start voting for [DISCUSS] Migrate TestNg Assertion to AssertJ . It will
stay open for at least 48 hours.
The discussion thread is
https://lists.apache.org/thread/fo43qg3jtoqy62j2zyro3j88jfhtbnpr .
I make the two options based on the discussion:
[
