Re: [VOTE] Github action migration plan

2019-12-03 Thread Ali Ahmed
It can take days to get a jenkins pass, we should be focused on migrating what we have first adding new workflows on a stable base is easy to do. -Ali On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 8:04 PM Sijie Guo wrote: > Ali, Xiaolong, > > Instead of waiting for the whole pull request to pass, how about adding > t

Re: [VOTE] Github action migration plan

2019-12-03 Thread Sijie Guo
Ali, Xiaolong, Instead of waiting for the whole pull request to pass, how about adding those go unit tests and code style verification as new Github Action? So we can start moving towards Github Action. Thoughts? Thanks, Sijie On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 7:54 PM Ali Ahmed wrote: > Absolutely we l

Re: [VOTE] Github action migration plan

2019-12-03 Thread Ali Ahmed
Absolutely we launch 30 jobs in parallel per pr so it should not be a problem, once we finish migration of current jobs we can start the process of adding new ones. -Ali On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 6:39 PM xiaolong ran wrote: > Thanks Ali work for this, overall looks good to me. > > Currently, Jenki

Re: [VOTE] Github action migration plan

2019-12-03 Thread xiaolong ran
Thanks Ali work for this, overall looks good to me. Currently, Jenkins does not check the unit tests and code specifications related to Go, as follows: - pulsar-client-go - pulsar-functions-go In GitHub action CI. Can we consider integrating them? https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/3774

Re: [VOTE] Github action migration plan

2019-12-02 Thread Ali Ahmed
Here is PIP document https://docs.google.com/document/d/13QKvfTj4-AMt3j7JTSE7LcyiXBK0Z0EGzp5HgMwpoj4/edit# On Sun, Dec 1, 2019 at 9:13 PM Sijie Guo wrote: > Without a PIP, the knowledge scatters out into many different places and > many different conversations. > a PIP is better since other peo

Re: [VOTE] Github action migration plan

2019-12-01 Thread Sijie Guo
Without a PIP, the knowledge scatters out into many different places and many different conversations. a PIP is better since other people in the community can participate in the development if they are interested in helping this. - Sijie On Sun, Dec 1, 2019 at 8:53 PM Ali Ahmed wrote: > Sure f

Re: [VOTE] Github action migration plan

2019-12-01 Thread Ali Ahmed
Sure for unit test the plan is relatively simple. I have isolated a core stable base which we can activate as a checkin condition. https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/5642/files#diff-00053b72be028281c6f9a446fbf91ef5 The unstable tests will be need to rewritten before being removed from exclusio

Re: [VOTE] Github action migration plan

2019-12-01 Thread Sijie Guo
Ali, Thank you for driving this. Overall looks good. I am fine with most of the proposal. However I would like to see what is the plan to migrate the remaining java tests and integration tests. In your current email, there are a lot of unknowns regarding java unit tests and integration tests. I w

[VOTE] Github action migration plan

2019-11-30 Thread Ali Ahmed
Hello everyone , I am doing experiments with github CI and I believe we are ready to vote on the transition plan. Briefly the current jenkins env is problematic there is resources contention, limited parallelism and lack of control to do experiments. The first version of the github actions ci is