Re: [PIP-48] Hierarchical admin api

2019-11-01 Thread Matteo Merli
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 4:12 AM Sijie Guo wrote: > > Hi Matteo, > > I think the main proposal that Florentin and Steven proposed is to define a > `scope` for each restful api. I get the "scope" part, though it comes out confusing in proposal since there are multiple statements either not accurate

Re: [PIP-48] Hierarchical admin api

2019-10-31 Thread Sijie Guo
Hi Matteo, I think the main proposal that Florentin and Steven proposed is to define a `scope` for each restful api. The scope indicates where a client should send the http request. The current restful APIs can be categorized into three scopes: - broker: send to this broker. - cluster: send to an

Re: [PIP-48] Hierarchical admin api

2019-10-30 Thread Matteo Merli
Hi Florentin, I have bit of trouble understanding the motivation and scope of this proposal. There seems to be a mix of multiple different items. > Also, Pulsar evoled to the ability to manage multiple clusters. Pulsar had the ability of managing multiple clusters from day 0 (or I should say d

[PIP-48] Hierarchical admin api

2019-10-30 Thread Florentin Dubois
Hello, We (Steven and I) have written a draft of pulsar improvement proposal about the admin api. We would like to get some feedback/review about it :D The pip is here: https://gist.github.com/FlorentinDUBOIS/4f98c0f71bf6514309b0414290b48e6a Feel free to contact me on slack or on this mai