Re: [DISCUSSION] PIP-121: Pulsar cluster level auto failover

2022-01-09 Thread Hang Chen
Looks there is no objection, I will start the official vote for PIP-121 Regards, Hang Enrico Olivelli 于2022年1月6日周四 01:52写道: > > I am commeting on the GH issue > > Thanks > > Enrico > > Il Mer 5 Gen 2022, 04:56 PengHui Li ha scritto: > > > +1 > > > > Penghui > > > > On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 4:51 P

Re: [DISCUSSION] PIP-121: Pulsar cluster level auto failover

2022-01-05 Thread Enrico Olivelli
I am commeting on the GH issue Thanks Enrico Il Mer 5 Gen 2022, 04:56 PengHui Li ha scritto: > +1 > > Penghui > > On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 4:51 PM Hang Chen wrote: > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13315 > > > > Pasted below for quoting convenience. > > > > > > ### Motivation >

Re: [DISCUSSION] PIP-121: Pulsar cluster level auto failover

2022-01-04 Thread PengHui Li
+1 Penghui On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 4:51 PM Hang Chen wrote: > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13315 > > Pasted below for quoting convenience. > > > ### Motivation > We have geo-replication to support Pulsar cluster level failover. We > can setup Pulsar cluster A as a primary cluster

[DISCUSSION] PIP-121: Pulsar cluster level auto failover

2022-01-04 Thread Hang Chen
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13315 Pasted below for quoting convenience. ### Motivation We have geo-replication to support Pulsar cluster level failover. We can setup Pulsar cluster A as a primary cluster in data center A, and setup Pulsar cluster B as backup cluster in data cente