> Moreover, this process should not consume excessive time. Simply initiate
> the script, await the deployment, and execute the test. I have personally
> performed this procedure numerous times with success. :)
That will be cool. Looking forward to it. btw, I am not sure if I remember
correctly. D
Hi Qiang,
Lastly, it would be beneficial to conduct a test on the distributions as
the ConcurrentHashMap has demonstrated improved efficiency. However, a
drawback is the potential increase in JVM GC overhead. If we can assess the
final outcome of the Pulsar benchmark, the findings would be more
pe
Hi, Guys.
IMO, It's a data structure difference. We can give the benchmark of two
structures in different situations (pulsar using situations).
> we can built a distribution for the benchmark. After we get the result,
> then we can decide if it's fine to go to the new solution. The change should
I also support the idea.
For the execution. I think we can have a branch to apply the changes and
then
we can built a distribution for the benchmark. After we get the result,
then we can
decide if it's fine to go to the new solution. The change should also be
applied to
bookkeeper. And I can help
I support replacing it with JDK's ConcurrentHashMap. Maintaining a
customized concurrent hash map whose algorithm is essentially the same
with the implementation of a very old version of JDK is painful. The
PROs listed like no boxing and linear probing have not proved to be
better by any benchmark.
On 2023/09/06 04:22:58 QQ wrote:
> Hi Pulsar Community,
>
> I’d like to start a discussion about whether replacing the customize util
> class like ConcurrentOpenHashMap with ConcurrentHashMap, as the performance
> of ConcurrentHashMap is better than those customize util significantly.
> Worse
Hi Pulsar Community,
I’d like to start a discussion about whether replacing the customize util class
like ConcurrentOpenHashMap with ConcurrentHashMap, as the performance of
ConcurrentHashMap is better than those customize util significantly.
Worse, these customize util class cannot ensure cons
