Re: [DISCUSS] Pulsar 3.0 - dreaming of the ability to rename objects

2022-12-02 Thread Asaf Mesika
I don’t have a solution to your problem, but I can share some thoughts I had when reading your suggestion: (1) Simplicity I’m relatively new to Pulsar, and I try to learn it as I go. One thing I can say for sure: Pulsar is complicated, both user-facing and internals. Just the other way, I read a

Re: [DISCUSS] Pulsar 3.0 - dreaming of the ability to rename objects

2022-09-07 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Il giorno mar 6 set 2022 alle ore 07:46 Lari Hotari ha scritto: > > I have been thinking of the need for supporting renaming tenants, namespaces > and topics while doing some initial design for "Pulsar 3.0 brainstorming: > Going beyond PIP-45 Pluggable metadata interface", thread > https://list

Re: [DISCUSS] Pulsar 3.0 - dreaming of the ability to rename objects

2022-09-05 Thread Lari Hotari
I have been thinking of the need for supporting renaming tenants, namespaces and topics while doing some initial design for "Pulsar 3.0 brainstorming: Going beyond PIP-45 Pluggable metadata interface", thread https://lists.apache.org/thread/roohoc9h2gthvmd7t81do4hfjs2gphpk . (the thread doesn't

[DISCUSS] Pulsar 3.0 - dreaming of the ability to rename objects

2022-09-05 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Hello, Now that we have started to think about Pulsar 3.0, let me share another long standing feature that can be implemented mostly only with such big changes that would deserve a major version bump. Currently every object managed by Pulsar is directly handled and referred using a logical, human