Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-91: Separate lookup timeout from operation timeout

2021-08-10 Thread Ivan Kelly
First change for this is up: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/11627 On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 7:34 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > +1 > looking forward to the implementation > > thanks > > Enrico > > Il giorno mar 10 ago 2021 alle ore 08:06 Yunze Xu > ha scritto: > > > +1 > > > > It makes sense

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-91: Separate lookup timeout from operation timeout

2021-08-09 Thread Enrico Olivelli
+1 looking forward to the implementation thanks Enrico Il giorno mar 10 ago 2021 alle ore 08:06 Yunze Xu ha scritto: > +1 > > It makes sense to me. I also encountered TooManyRequests in topic lookup > when there’re a lot of topics. > > It should be retriable instead of a simple error response

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-91: Separate lookup timeout from operation timeout

2021-08-09 Thread Yunze Xu
+1 It makes sense to me. I also encountered TooManyRequests in topic lookup when there’re a lot of topics. It should be retriable instead of a simple error response to client. Thanks, Yunze > 2021年8月9日 下午10:11,Ivan Kelly 写道: > > Hi folks, > > I've created a PIP to do some rework on lookup t

[DISCUSS] PIP-91: Separate lookup timeout from operation timeout

2021-08-09 Thread Ivan Kelly
Hi folks, I've created a PIP to do some rework on lookup timeouts and retries. We've had major client incidents recently due to a client with many many producers, which triggered a herding effect on broker restarts. This PIP aims to alleviate some of the issues we saw. In summary, we want to retr