Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-334:Create a new admin API: pck (Pulsar Consistency Checker)

Sure, that's a good suggestion. Maybe we can refer to the implementation of pulsar-perf. -- Best Regards！ crossoverJie Haiting Jiang 于2024年2月6日周二 11:38写道： > The motivation LGTM. > But I am not sure if it's possible to implement at client side, > without adding a new admin API? > My main concer

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-334:Create a new admin API: pck (Pulsar Consistency Checker)

The motivation LGTM. But I am not sure if it's possible to implement at client side, without adding a new admin API? My main concern is this method may run for quite a while. And it's not easy to see the progress if it's implemented on the server. Thanks, Haiting On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 6:50 PM J

[DISCUSS] PIP-334:Create a new admin API: pck (Pulsar Consistency Checker)

Hi dev, I proposed a PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21988 Sometimes we need to check if there are any orphan ledgers in the bookkeeper. So I'm planning to create an admin API. Specific implementation logic is referred to in this link