Hi Michael,
I agree with cherry-picking to release branches.
And should be highlighted in the release note.
Thanks,
Penghui
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 12:14 PM Michael Marshall
wrote:
> The delivery semantics are a very succinct way to describe my concerns,
> thanks for your comment Penghui.
>
>
The delivery semantics are a very succinct way to describe my concerns,
thanks for your comment Penghui.
My only other question is whether we classify the behavior change as a
regression that should be fixed in existing releases or if it should only
be reverted for 2.12 and beyond. I propose it sh
I support this motivation. We should avoid any cases which
might break the at-least-one delivery semantic from the user's perspective.
Thanks,
Penghui
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 1:36 PM Michael Marshall
wrote:
> Hi Pulsar Community,
>
> In Pulsar 2.5.0, the semantics for a message's redeliveryCoun
Hi Pulsar Community,
In Pulsar 2.5.0, the semantics for a message's redeliveryCount changed
at the request of this issue [0]. Please see the issue for relevant
context.
In summary, the issue is whether a message that is neither positively
nor negatively acknowledged should get counted as "redeliv
