Re: [DISCUSS] Homebrew libpulsar

2020-01-22 Thread Sijie Guo
If that's the case, we should document the process in the release process documentation. Can you help update the wiki page? - Sijie On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 1:23 PM Matteo Merli wrote: > In general, Homebrew will only accept updates to the formula once a > particular software version is already

Re: [DISCUSS] Homebrew libpulsar

2020-01-21 Thread Matteo Merli
In general, Homebrew will only accept updates to the formula once a particular software version is already released. We could certainly include it as a post-step in our release process, to do after the official release announcement is done. -- Matteo Merli On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 11:08 AM Siji

Re: [DISCUSS] Homebrew libpulsar

2020-01-21 Thread Sijie Guo
Thanks Dave. So the question will be - shall the release manager be responsible for updating the homebrew entry? If so, we need to include it in the release procedure. Thanks, Sijie On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 2:03 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > Hi - > > I’ve played with Homebrew before and from the git

Re: [DISCUSS] Homebrew libpulsar

2020-01-20 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi - I’ve played with Homebrew before and from the git log I can see that Matteo created the initial version, but for the most part the Homebrew community has maintained the script. Here is the current script: Formula/libpulsar.rb class Libpulsar < Formula desc "Apache Pulsar C++ library"

[DISCUSS] Homebrew libpulsar

2020-01-20 Thread Sijie Guo
Hi all, It is my first time to realize that there is a libpulsar entry in homebrew. (https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/6091). Are Pulsar committers responsible for updating this? Or homebrew team is updating that entry? If the committers are responsible for updating it, it should have been