Re: [DISCUSS] Clear definition for the APIs we should not remove or change simply

2024-03-20 Thread Yunze Xu
> I think that this is too broad. It would essentially prevent most > refactorings and improvements to Pulsar. It makes sense. I will take some time to learn the use of japicmp. Thanks, Yunze On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 8:59 PM Lari Hotari wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 at 13:50, Yunze Xu wrote:

Re: [DISCUSS] Clear definition for the APIs we should not remove or change simply

2024-03-20 Thread Lari Hotari
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 at 13:50, Yunze Xu wrote: > Currently, there is no clear definition for the maintain strategy of > public APIs. To make it more clear, I mean "public interface methods" > and "public class methods" when I mentioned "public APIs".It's very > ambiguous if it's acceptable to modif

[DISCUSS] Clear definition for the APIs we should not remove or change simply

2024-03-20 Thread Yunze Xu
Hi community, I'd like to bring back the discussion again since a similar discussion happened long ago [1]. Currently, there is no clear definition for the maintain strategy of public APIs. To make it more clear, I mean "public interface methods" and "public class methods" when I mentioned "publi