Re: [ DISCUSS ]PIP-50: Package Management

2019-11-03 Thread Yong Zhang
Hi Sijie, Thanks for your suggestion! I will do it as you suggested. Thanks, Yong On Sat, 2 Nov 2019 at 12:24, Sijie Guo wrote: > Hi Yong, > > Thank you for putting this together. The overall approach looks good to me. > Since we already use bookkeeper for package management, this proposal

Re: [ DISCUSS ]PIP-50: Package Management

2019-11-01 Thread Sijie Guo
Hi Yong, Thank you for putting this together. The overall approach looks good to me. Since we already use bookkeeper for package management, this proposal just abstracts the package management into a common facility. That seems totally reasonable. I have two suggestions: 1) make the package stor

Re: [ DISCUSS ]PIP-50: Package Management

2019-10-31 Thread Guangning E
I think this feature is very useful and I look forward to it. Thanks, Guangning Yong Zhang 于2019年10月31日周四 下午5:03写道: > Hi all, > > I am starting a proposal about providing a package management to manage > user functions and connectors. > > *motivation* > > Apache Pulsar provides Functions for us

[ DISCUSS ]PIP-50: Package Management

2019-10-31 Thread Yong Zhang
Hi all, I am starting a proposal about providing a package management to manage user functions and connectors. *motivation* Apache Pulsar provides Functions for users transforming their data as they want. If there are many users who use the same function in different namespaces, they need to up